PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIDSX vs. FSENX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIDSX vs. FSENX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDSX achieves a -2.20% return, which is significantly lower than FSENX's 35.02% return. Over the past 10 years, FIDSX has outperformed FSENX with an annualized return of 12.65%, while FSENX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.68% annualized return.


FIDSX

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.19%
YTD
-2.20%
6M
-4.00%
1Y
2.96%
3Y*
19.27%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
12.65%

FSENX

1D
1.38%
1M
-2.65%
YTD
35.02%
6M
31.99%
1Y
51.42%
3Y*
19.21%
5Y*
22.08%
10Y*
9.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDSX vs. FSENX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIDSX
Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio
-2.20%9.33%32.82%14.53%-8.19%33.13%1.22%34.25%-16.13%20.92%
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
35.02%10.56%4.26%0.94%62.98%55.31%-32.51%9.90%-24.94%-2.65%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDSX and FSENX is 0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.07

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 1981

0.47

Over the past year, the correlation between FIDSX and FSENX has dropped to 0.07 - well below their long-term average of 0.47, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIDSX vs. FSENX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDSX
FIDSX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FIDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

FSENX
FSENX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FSENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSENX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FSENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSENX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDSX vs. FSENX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) and Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIDSXFSENXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.43

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.21

5.42

-5.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.53

15.96

-15.44

FIDSX vs. FSENX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the FSENX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDSX and FSENX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIDSXFSENXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

2.74

-2.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

0.81

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.31

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.32

+0.16

Drawdowns

FIDSX vs. FSENX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDSX drawdown since its inception was -74.26%, roughly equal to the maximum FSENX drawdown of -76.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDSX and FSENX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIDSXFSENXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-74.26%

-76.24%

+1.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.60%

-9.95%

-6.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.44%

-25.85%

+6.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.49%

-28.02%

+3.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.48%

-72.11%

+26.63%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.03%

-5.09%

-3.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.95%

-17.01%

+3.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.69%

3.37%

+3.32%

Volatility

FIDSX vs. FSENX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) is 3.43%, while Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio (FSENX) has a volatility of 7.60%. This indicates that FIDSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSENX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIDSXFSENXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.43%

7.60%

-4.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.15%

15.35%

-2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.89%

19.70%

-2.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.86%

27.26%

-6.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.67%

30.96%

-7.29%

FIDSX vs. FSENX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDSX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than FSENX's 0.77% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIDSX vs. FSENX - Dividend Comparison

FIDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than FSENX's 1.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FIDSX
Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio
1.48%1.70%6.03%3.01%11.32%4.12%5.86%5.57%12.89%4.22%1.00%0.70%
FSENX
Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio
1.59%1.95%1.95%1.98%2.50%2.25%3.43%1.84%1.48%1.74%0.62%1.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIDSX and FSENX have a correlation of 0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSENX has higher volatility (7.60%) compared to FIDSX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDSX dropped -74.26% vs FSENX's -76.24%.

FSENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIDSX and FSENX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer