FIDSX vs. BTO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FIDSX (Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio) and BTO (John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund) are both Financials Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FIDSX returned 12.65%/yr vs 9.96%/yr for BTO. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIDSX charges 0.73%/yr vs 2.01%/yr for BTO.

Performance

FIDSX vs. BTO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) and John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund (BTO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDSX achieves a -2.20% return, which is significantly lower than BTO's 4.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FIDSX has outperformed BTO with an annualized return of 12.65%, while BTO has yielded a comparatively lower 9.96% annualized return.

FIDSX

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -0.19%
• YTD: -2.20%
• 6M: -4.00%
• 1Y: 2.96%
• 3Y*: 19.27%
• 5Y*: 8.70%
• 10Y*: 12.65%

BTO

• 1D: -2.12%
• 1M: -2.39%
• YTD: 4.49%
• 6M: 7.05%
• 1Y: 13.27%
• 3Y*: 20.35%
• 5Y*: 3.86%
• 10Y*: 9.96%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDSX vs. BTO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIDSX Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio	-2.20%	9.33%	32.82%	14.53%	-8.19%	33.13%	1.22%	34.25%	-16.13%	20.92%
BTO John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund	4.49%	5.85%	28.92%	-1.16%	-23.58%	61.86%	-8.97%	38.87%	-25.68%	13.12%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDSX and BTO is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.69
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 18, 1994	0.74

The correlation between FIDSX and BTO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FIDSX vs. BTO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDSX

FIDSX Risk / Return Rank: 4
FIDSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FIDSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FIDSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FIDSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
FIDSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3

BTO

BTO Risk / Return Rank: 8
BTO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
BTO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
BTO Omega Ratio Rank: 8
BTO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
BTO Martin Ratio Rank: 7

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDSX vs. BTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) and John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund (BTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIDSX	BTO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.21	0.65	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.38	1.03	-0.65
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	1.13	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.21	0.87	-0.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.53	2.17	-1.64
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIDSX vs. BTO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDSX Sharpe Ratio is 0.21, which is lower than the BTO Sharpe Ratio of 0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDSX and BTO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIDSX	BTO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.21	0.65	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42	0.12	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	0.28	+0.26
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.48	0.30	+0.19

Drawdowns

FIDSX vs. BTO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDSX drawdown since its inception was -74.26%, roughly equal to the maximum BTO drawdown of -72.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDSX and BTO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIDSX	BTO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.26%	-72.27%	-1.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.60%	-15.26%	-1.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.44%	-25.19%	+5.75%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.49%	-51.80%	+27.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-45.48%	-65.70%	+20.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.03%	-7.74%	-1.29%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.95%	-19.00%	+5.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.69%	6.13%	+0.56%

Volatility

FIDSX vs. BTO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) is 3.43%, while John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund (BTO) has a volatility of 5.15%. This indicates that FIDSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIDSX	BTO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.43%	5.15%	-1.72%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.15%	14.97%	-1.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.89%	20.62%	-3.73%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.86%	31.35%	-10.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.67%	36.13%	-12.46%

FIDSX vs. BTO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDSX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than BTO's 2.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

FIDSX vs. BTO - Dividend Comparison

FIDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.48%, less than BTO's 7.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BTO John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund	7.23%	7.41%	7.28%	8.64%	7.51%	4.72%	7.25%	6.06%	5.94%	3.76%	5.10%	4.75%
FIDSX Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio	1.48%	1.70%	6.03%	3.01%	11.32%	4.12%	5.86%	5.57%	12.89%	4.22%	1.00%	0.70%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FIDSX and BTO in my portfolio?

FIDSX and BTO have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FIDSX or BTO?

BTO has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to FIDSX (3.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDSX dropped -74.26% vs BTO's -72.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BTO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.65 vs 0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.