FIDSX vs. BTO
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) and John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund (BTO).
FIDSX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 10, 1981. BTO is an actively managed fund by John Hancock. It was launched on Aug 18, 1994.
Performance
FIDSX vs. BTO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIDSX vs. BTO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDSX Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio | -9.46% | 9.33% | 27.56% | 14.53% | -8.19% | 33.13% | 1.22% | 34.25% | -16.13% | 20.92% |
BTO John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund | 4.20% | 5.85% | 28.92% | -1.16% | -23.58% | 61.86% | -8.97% | 38.87% | -25.68% | 13.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIDSX achieves a -9.46% return, which is significantly lower than BTO's 4.20% return. Over the past 10 years, FIDSX has outperformed BTO with an annualized return of 11.65%, while BTO has yielded a comparatively lower 10.87% annualized return.
FIDSX
- 1D
- 0.98%
- 1M
- -5.37%
- YTD
- -9.46%
- 6M
- -10.80%
- 1Y
- -0.81%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- 8.37%
- 10Y*
- 11.65%
BTO
- 1D
- 4.88%
- 1M
- 2.50%
- YTD
- 4.20%
- 6M
- 3.43%
- 1Y
- 13.12%
- 3Y*
- 14.52%
- 5Y*
- 6.15%
- 10Y*
- 10.87%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIDSX vs. BTO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIDSX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than BTO's 2.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIDSX vs. BTO — Risk / Return Rank
FIDSX
BTO
FIDSX vs. BTO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) and John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund (BTO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIDSX | BTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | 0.53 | -0.53 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.15 | 0.88 | -0.73 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.12 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.15 | 0.82 | -0.96 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.41 | 2.13 | -2.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIDSX | BTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.00 | 0.53 | -0.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 | 0.20 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.30 | +0.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.30 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIDSX and BTO is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIDSX vs. BTO - Dividend Comparison
FIDSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.88%, less than BTO's 7.25% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDSX Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio | 1.88% | 1.70% | 1.86% | 3.01% | 11.32% | 4.12% | 5.86% | 5.57% | 12.89% | 4.22% | 1.00% | 0.70% |
BTO John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund | 7.25% | 7.41% | 7.28% | 8.64% | 7.51% | 4.72% | 7.25% | 6.06% | 5.94% | 3.76% | 5.10% | 4.75% |
Drawdowns
FIDSX vs. BTO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIDSX drawdown since its inception was -74.26%, roughly equal to the maximum BTO drawdown of -72.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDSX and BTO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIDSX | BTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.26% | -72.27% | -1.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.60% | -16.79% | +0.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.49% | -51.80% | +27.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.48% | -65.70% | +20.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.78% | -8.00% | -7.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -14.00% | -19.08% | +5.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.96% | 6.45% | -0.49% |
Volatility
FIDSX vs. BTO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Select Financial Services Portfolio (FIDSX) is 4.53%, while John Hancock Financial Opportunities Fund (BTO) has a volatility of 7.28%. This indicates that FIDSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIDSX | BTO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 7.28% | -2.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.73% | 16.38% | -2.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.95% | 24.68% | -2.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.95% | 31.47% | -10.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.68% | 36.21% | -12.53% |