FIDLX vs. GQHPX

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class Z (FIDLX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX).

FIDLX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 1, 2017. GQHPX is managed by GQG Partners Inc. It was launched on Jun 29, 2021.

Performance

FIDLX vs. GQHPX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class Z (FIDLX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FIDLX vs. GQHPX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FIDLX Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class Z	0.00%	19.77%	26.52%	23.65%	-7.81%	4.68%
GQHPX GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund	11.80%	7.53%	12.69%	3.94%	6.73%	10.34%

Returns By Period

FIDLX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: -1.18%
• 1Y: 22.06%
• 3Y*: 20.71%
• 5Y*: 13.86%
• 10Y*: —

GQHPX

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -2.01%
• YTD: 11.80%
• 6M: 11.28%
• 1Y: 11.07%
• 3Y*: 12.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDLX vs. GQHPX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDLX has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is lower than GQHPX's 0.57% expense ratio.

GQHPX

GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund

FIDLX

Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class Z

Return for Risk

FIDLX vs. GQHPX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDLX

FIDLX Risk / Return Rank: 67
FIDLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FIDLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FIDLX Omega Ratio Rank: 92
FIDLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 40
FIDLX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

GQHPX

GQHPX Risk / Return Rank: 39
GQHPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
GQHPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GQHPX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
GQHPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
GQHPX Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDLX vs. GQHPX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class Z (FIDLX) and GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIDLX	GQHPX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	0.93	+0.52
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.08	1.28	+0.80
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.45	1.18	+0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.12	1.37	-0.24
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.68	4.50	+0.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIDLX vs. GQHPX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is higher than the GQHPX Sharpe Ratio of 0.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDLX and GQHPX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIDLX	GQHPX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.46	0.93	+0.52
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.73	0.90	-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between FIDLX and GQHPX is 0.66, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FIDLX vs. GQHPX - Dividend Comparison

FIDLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.87%, more than GQHPX's 2.66% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIDLX Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class Z	5.87%	5.87%	6.23%	3.56%	2.42%	6.64%	5.53%	8.55%	17.01%	6.13%
GQHPX GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund	2.66%	2.98%	3.14%	2.64%	3.24%	0.77%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FIDLX vs. GQHPX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDLX drawdown since its inception was -37.51%, which is greater than GQHPX's maximum drawdown of -17.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDLX and GQHPX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIDLX	GQHPX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.51%	-17.26%	-20.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.28%	-8.17%	-4.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.42%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.17%	-2.15%	-2.02%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.55%	-3.36%	-1.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.53%	2.64%	+0.89%

Volatility

FIDLX vs. GQHPX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class Z (FIDLX) is 0.00%, while GQG Partners US Quality Dividend Income Fund (GQHPX) has a volatility of 2.66%. This indicates that FIDLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GQHPX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIDLX	GQHPX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	2.66%	-2.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.84%	6.98%	-1.14%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.14%	11.90%	+5.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.54%	12.67%	+3.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.06%	12.67%	+6.39%