PortfoliosLab logo
FIDLX vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FIDLX and ^GSPC is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

FIDLX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class Z (FIDLX) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FIDLX:

0.49

^GSPC:

0.64

Sortino Ratio

FIDLX:

0.84

^GSPC:

1.09

Omega Ratio

FIDLX:

1.13

^GSPC:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

FIDLX:

0.50

^GSPC:

0.72

Martin Ratio

FIDLX:

1.71

^GSPC:

2.74

Ulcer Index

FIDLX:

6.23%

^GSPC:

4.95%

Daily Std Dev

FIDLX:

20.35%

^GSPC:

19.62%

Max Drawdown

FIDLX:

-40.12%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

FIDLX:

-4.14%

^GSPC:

-3.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDLX achieves a 5.04% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 1.30% return.


FIDLX

YTD

5.04%

1M

14.56%

6M

-1.03%

1Y

9.88%

5Y*

17.39%

10Y*

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

1.30%

1M

12.94%

6M

1.49%

1Y

12.48%

5Y*

15.82%

10Y*

10.87%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FIDLX vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDLX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FIDLX is 5353
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FIDLX is 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FIDLX is 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FIDLX is 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FIDLX is 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FIDLX is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 7676
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FIDLX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class Z (FIDLX) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FIDLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.49, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDLX and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

FIDLX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDLX drawdown since its inception was -40.12%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDLX and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FIDLX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Large Cap Fund Class Z (FIDLX) and S&P 500 (^GSPC) have volatilities of 5.16% and 5.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...