FIDI vs. KEMX
FIDI (Fidelity International High Dividend ETF) and KEMX (KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds - FIDI tracks the Fidelity® International High Dividend Index while KEMX tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FIDI returned 10.43%/yr vs 13.52%/yr for KEMX. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FIDI charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for KEMX.
Performance
FIDI vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIDI achieves a 8.93% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 42.26% return.
FIDI
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- 0.38%
- YTD
- 8.93%
- 6M
- 12.21%
- 1Y
- 25.24%
- 3Y*
- 19.10%
- 5Y*
- 10.43%
- 10Y*
- —
KEMX
- 1D
- -1.31%
- 1M
- 13.02%
- YTD
- 42.26%
- 6M
- 47.92%
- 1Y
- 79.97%
- 3Y*
- 29.66%
- 5Y*
- 13.52%
- 10Y*
- —
FIDI vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDI Fidelity International High Dividend ETF | 8.93% | 39.34% | -0.06% | 16.28% | -4.73% | 16.87% | -11.68% | 4.39% |
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 42.26% | 38.28% | 0.36% | 20.57% | -19.35% | 10.55% | 12.84% | 7.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIDI and KEMX is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 15, 2019 | 0.70 |
The correlation between FIDI and KEMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIDI vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank
FIDI
KEMX
FIDI vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International High Dividend ETF (FIDI) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIDI | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.35 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.62 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.65 | 5.24 | -1.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.04 | 20.86 | -7.81 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIDI | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.19 | 3.59 | -1.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.75 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.68 | -0.37 |
Drawdowns
FIDI vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIDI drawdown since its inception was -46.34%, which is greater than KEMX's maximum drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDI and KEMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIDI | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.34% | -38.80% | -7.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.96% | -15.36% | +8.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.09% | -19.62% | +7.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.05% | -30.85% | +4.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.24% | -1.31% | -0.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.79% | -8.86% | -0.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.94% | 3.85% | -1.91% |
Volatility
FIDI vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity International High Dividend ETF (FIDI) is 3.09%, while KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX) has a volatility of 9.86%. This indicates that FIDI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KEMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIDI | KEMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.09% | 9.86% | -6.77% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.00% | 19.90% | -10.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.60% | 22.40% | -10.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.84% | 18.21% | -3.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 20.94% | -2.21% |
FIDI vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIDI has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIDI vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison
FIDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, more than KEMX's 2.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDI Fidelity International High Dividend ETF | 4.13% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.80% | 5.09% | 4.00% | 3.36% | 4.26% | 4.37% |
KEMX KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF | 2.31% | 3.28% | 3.39% | 2.00% | 4.10% | 4.79% | 1.69% | 2.77% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIDI and KEMX have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
KEMX has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to FIDI (3.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDI dropped -46.34% vs KEMX's -38.80%.
On 5-year performance, KEMX leads with 13.52% vs 10.43% for FIDI. On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FIDI has been the lower-risk option at 3.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, KEMX has performed better with a 13.52% return vs 10.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for FIDI.
FIDI has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 2.31% for KEMX.
FIDI tracks Fidelity® International High Dividend Index, while KEMX tracks MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FIDI and 0.25% for KEMX.
KEMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.59 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIDI and KEMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer