PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIDI vs. CIL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIDI vs. CIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International High Dividend ETF (FIDI) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDI achieves a 8.93% return, which is significantly higher than CIL's 5.44% return.


FIDI

1D
-0.57%
1M
0.38%
YTD
8.93%
6M
12.21%
1Y
25.24%
3Y*
19.10%
5Y*
10.43%
10Y*

CIL

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
5.44%
6M
7.94%
1Y
17.37%
3Y*
15.59%
5Y*
7.45%
10Y*
8.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDI vs. CIL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FIDI
Fidelity International High Dividend ETF
8.93%39.34%-0.06%16.28%-4.73%16.87%-11.68%15.47%-20.16%
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
5.44%32.99%3.76%16.29%-16.00%11.07%7.21%19.13%-16.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDI and CIL is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2018

0.74

The correlation between FIDI and CIL shifts across timeframes, from 0.71 (1 year) to 0.88 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIDI vs. CIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDI
FIDI Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FIDI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDI Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDI Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

CIL
CIL Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
CIL Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
CIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
CIL Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDI vs. CIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International High Dividend ETF (FIDI) and VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIDICILDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.49

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.65

3.95

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.04

16.75

-3.71

FIDI vs. CIL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDI Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the CIL Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDI and CIL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIDICILDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

2.24

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.46

+0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.43

-0.13

Drawdowns

FIDI vs. CIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDI drawdown since its inception was -46.34%, which is greater than CIL's maximum drawdown of -36.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDI and CIL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIDICILDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.34%

-36.27%

-10.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.96%

-4.60%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.09%

-11.96%

-0.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.05%

-29.89%

+3.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.24%

-0.58%

-1.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.79%

-6.56%

-3.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.94%

1.07%

+0.87%

Volatility

FIDI vs. CIL - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity International High Dividend ETF (FIDI) has a higher volatility of 3.09% compared to VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF (CIL) at 0.00%. This indicates that FIDI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIDICILDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

0.00%

+3.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.00%

4.23%

+4.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.60%

8.19%

+3.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.84%

16.49%

-1.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.73%

17.17%

+1.56%

FIDI vs. CIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDI has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CIL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIDI vs. CIL - Dividend Comparison

FIDI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.13%, more than CIL's 1.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CIL
VictoryShares International Volatility Wtd ETF
1.67%2.70%3.46%2.91%2.41%3.04%1.73%2.69%2.85%2.17%2.34%0.43%
FIDI
Fidelity International High Dividend ETF
4.13%4.33%5.72%4.80%5.09%4.00%3.36%4.26%4.37%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIDI and CIL have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIDI has higher volatility (3.09%) compared to CIL (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDI dropped -46.34% vs CIL's -36.27%.

On 5-year performance, FIDI leads with 10.43% vs 7.45% for CIL. On fees, FIDI is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, CIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FIDI has performed better with a 10.43% return vs 7.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FIDI is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for CIL.

FIDI has the higher dividend yield at 4.13%, compared with 1.67% for CIL.

FIDI tracks Fidelity® International High Dividend Index, while CIL tracks Nasdaq Victory International 500 Volatility Weighted Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for FIDI and 0.45% for CIL.

CIL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIDI and CIL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer