FIDGX vs. ^GSPC

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class Z (FIDGX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC).

FIDGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 1, 2017.

Performance

FIDGX vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class Z (FIDGX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FIDGX vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FIDGX Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class Z	-5.48%	11.29%	20.67%	19.17%	-25.25%	10.63%	36.52%	36.54%	-4.45%	22.27%
^GSPC S&P 500 Index	-4.63%	16.39%	23.31%	24.23%	-19.44%	26.89%	16.26%	28.88%	-6.24%	15.85%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDGX achieves a -5.48% return, which is significantly lower than ^GSPC's -4.63% return.

FIDGX

• 1D: -2.45%
• 1M: -10.06%
• YTD: -5.48%
• 6M: -2.52%
• 1Y: 18.22%
• 3Y*: 12.16%
• 5Y*: 3.60%
• 10Y*: —

^GSPC

• 1D: 2.91%
• 1M: -5.09%
• YTD: -4.63%
• 6M: -2.39%
• 1Y: 16.33%
• 3Y*: 16.69%
• 5Y*: 10.18%
• 10Y*: 12.16%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FIDGX vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDGX

FIDGX Risk / Return Rank: 36
FIDGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
FIDGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FIDGX Omega Ratio Rank: 29
FIDGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
FIDGX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

^GSPC

^GSPC Risk / Return Rank: 74
^GSPC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
^GSPC Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
^GSPC Omega Ratio Rank: 76
^GSPC Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
^GSPC Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDGX vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class Z (FIDGX) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FIDGX	^GSPC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.73	0.90	-0.17
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.15	1.39	-0.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.21	-0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.10	1.40	-0.30
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.17	6.61	-2.44
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FIDGX vs. ^GSPC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is comparable to the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDGX and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FIDGX	^GSPC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73	0.90	-0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	0.61	-0.45
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.46	+0.04

Correlation

The correlation between FIDGX and ^GSPC is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Drawdowns

FIDGX vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDGX drawdown since its inception was -38.99%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDGX and ^GSPC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FIDGX	^GSPC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.99%	-56.78%	+17.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.78%	-12.14%	-1.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.99%	-25.43%	-13.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.09%	-6.45%	-6.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.96%	-10.75%	-0.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.64%	2.57%	+1.07%

Volatility

FIDGX vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Small Cap Growth Fund Class Z (FIDGX) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 5.34%. This indicates that FIDGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FIDGX	^GSPC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.45%	5.34%	+3.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.05%	9.54%	+6.51%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.52%	18.33%	+6.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.33%	16.91%	+6.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.30%	18.05%	+5.25%