FIDFX vs. HWMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIDFX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX).
FIDFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 1, 2017. HWMIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jan 2, 1997.
Performance
FIDFX vs. HWMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FIDFX vs. HWMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDFX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class Z | 3.52% | 13.16% | 14.66% | 22.69% | -10.52% | 34.11% | 1.15% | 23.72% | -18.82% | 13.56% |
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 6.74% | 7.87% | 3.62% | 19.87% | 1.63% | 39.18% | 0.49% | 12.97% | -19.32% | 6.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIDFX achieves a 3.52% return, which is significantly lower than HWMIX's 6.74% return.
FIDFX
- 1D
- 2.91%
- 1M
- -6.68%
- YTD
- 3.52%
- 6M
- 8.22%
- 1Y
- 22.27%
- 3Y*
- 17.34%
- 5Y*
- 10.71%
- 10Y*
- —
HWMIX
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 6.74%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FIDFX vs. HWMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIDFX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than HWMIX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FIDFX vs. HWMIX — Risk / Return Rank
FIDFX
HWMIX
FIDFX vs. HWMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIDFX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FIDFX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.06 | 0.93 | +0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.61 | 1.41 | +0.20 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.21 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.58 | 1.35 | +0.23 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.43 | 5.49 | +0.93 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FIDFX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 0.93 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.44 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.36 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.47 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between FIDFX and HWMIX is 0.90, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FIDFX vs. HWMIX - Dividend Comparison
FIDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.64%, more than HWMIX's 1.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIDFX Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class Z | 7.64% | 8.32% | 10.60% | 1.30% | 13.40% | 1.43% | 2.11% | 2.03% | 15.16% | 9.15% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 1.31% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.28% | 0.49% | 1.28% | 2.25% | 1.60% | 2.99% | 6.72% | 1.53% | 14.67% |
Drawdowns
FIDFX vs. HWMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIDFX drawdown since its inception was -44.98%, smaller than the maximum HWMIX drawdown of -69.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDFX and HWMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIDFX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.98% | -69.84% | +24.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.75% | -16.87% | +2.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.70% | -25.90% | +2.20% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -63.21% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.70% | -3.32% | -4.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.99% | -10.89% | +3.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.63% | 4.15% | -0.52% |
Volatility
FIDFX vs. HWMIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Mid Cap Value Fund Class Z (FIDFX) has a higher volatility of 6.54% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) at 4.30%. This indicates that FIDFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FIDFX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.54% | 4.30% | +2.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.12% | 12.42% | -0.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.62% | 23.86% | -2.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.16% | 22.34% | -2.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.72% | 25.62% | -3.90% |