PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIDAX vs. FFANX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIDAX vs. FFANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Financial Industries Fund (FIDAX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIDAX achieves a 2.64% return, which is significantly lower than FFANX's 7.45% return. Over the past 10 years, FIDAX has outperformed FFANX with an annualized return of 11.20%, while FFANX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.99% annualized return.


FIDAX

1D
0.87%
1M
3.40%
YTD
2.64%
6M
0.94%
1Y
11.73%
3Y*
20.57%
5Y*
8.02%
10Y*
11.20%

FFANX

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.41%
YTD
7.45%
6M
7.31%
1Y
16.42%
3Y*
11.28%
5Y*
5.36%
10Y*
6.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FIDAX vs. FFANX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FIDAX
John Hancock Financial Industries Fund
2.64%12.05%30.09%5.01%-14.17%28.80%1.58%31.21%-15.30%11.00%
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
7.45%13.16%7.40%11.52%-13.62%8.03%13.10%15.81%-4.06%11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FIDAX and FFANX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2007

0.73

The correlation between FIDAX and FFANX shifts across timeframes, from 0.57 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIDAX vs. FFANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIDAX
FIDAX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FIDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FIDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

FFANX
FFANX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FFANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFANX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FFANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFANX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIDAX vs. FFANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Financial Industries Fund (FIDAX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIDAXFFANXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.47

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

3.27

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.68

13.95

-11.27

FIDAX vs. FFANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIDAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.83, which is lower than the FFANX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIDAX and FFANX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIDAX vs. FFANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIDAX drawdown since its inception was -70.42%, which is greater than FFANX's maximum drawdown of -31.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIDAX and FFANX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIDAXFFANXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.42%

-31.69%

-38.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.82%

-5.20%

-8.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.35%

-7.55%

-11.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.89%

-18.52%

-12.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.09%

-18.52%

-23.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-0.13%

-0.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.05%

-3.79%

-10.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.95%

1.22%

+3.73%

Volatility

FIDAX vs. FFANX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Financial Industries Fund (FIDAX) has a higher volatility of 4.34% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) at 2.94%. This indicates that FIDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIDAXFFANXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.34%

2.94%

+1.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.52%

6.01%

+6.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.15%

7.09%

+9.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.66%

7.94%

+12.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.98%

7.74%

+14.24%

FIDAX vs. FFANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIDAX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FFANX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIDAX vs. FFANX - Dividend Comparison

FIDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.95%, more than FFANX's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
3.65%3.97%2.81%2.49%5.75%2.35%2.36%3.67%4.56%2.56%1.43%3.18%
FIDAX
John Hancock Financial Industries Fund
46.95%48.19%10.24%1.91%11.22%23.08%5.41%7.56%7.72%6.10%6.01%0.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIDAX and FFANX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIDAX has higher volatility (4.34%) compared to FFANX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIDAX dropped -70.42% vs FFANX's -31.69%.

FFANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIDAX and FFANX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer