PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FID vs. DFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FID vs. DFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) and Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FID achieves a 8.56% return, which is significantly lower than DFAX's 15.23% return.


FID

1D
-1.11%
1M
2.56%
YTD
8.56%
6M
10.95%
1Y
23.28%
3Y*
17.43%
5Y*
7.74%
10Y*

DFAX

1D
-1.00%
1M
3.89%
YTD
15.23%
6M
18.11%
1Y
34.96%
3Y*
20.90%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FID vs. DFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FID
First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF
8.56%32.07%5.42%9.92%-9.69%-1.01%
DFAX
Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF
15.23%35.42%4.78%16.66%-14.48%-2.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FID and DFAX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021

0.82

The correlation between FID and DFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

FID vs. DFAX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FID
DFAX

Financial Services

20.8%
17.9%

Utilities

17.4%
4.2%

Industrials

13.5%
16.1%

Communication Services

11.5%
3.5%

Real Estate

9.4%
3.1%

Energy

8.0%
6.6%

Basic Materials

4.3%
13.2%

Technology

4.1%
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

4.0%
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
3.9%

Healthcare

3.5%
5.6%

Financial Services

FID
20.8%
DFAX
17.9%

Utilities

FID
17.4%
DFAX
4.2%

Industrials

FID
13.5%
DFAX
16.1%

Communication Services

FID
11.5%
DFAX
3.5%

Real Estate

FID
9.4%
DFAX
3.1%

Energy

FID
8.0%
DFAX
6.6%

Basic Materials

FID
4.3%
DFAX
13.2%

Technology

FID
4.1%
DFAX
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

FID
4.0%
DFAX
10.9%

Consumer Defensive

FID
3.7%
DFAX
3.9%

Healthcare

FID
3.5%
DFAX
5.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FID vs. DFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FID
FID Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
FID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FID Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FID Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FID Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FID Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAX
DFAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
DFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FID vs. DFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) and Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIDDFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.43

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

3.16

-0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.14

12.50

-3.35

FID vs. DFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FID Sharpe Ratio is 2.30, which is comparable to the DFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FID and DFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIDDFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.30

2.37

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.65

-0.25

Drawdowns

FID vs. DFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FID drawdown since its inception was -39.79%, which is greater than DFAX's maximum drawdown of -28.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FID and DFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIDDFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.79%

-28.15%

-11.64%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.93%

-11.11%

+2.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.97%

-13.89%

+2.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-1.00%

-0.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.47%

-6.67%

-1.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.55%

2.80%

-0.25%

Volatility

FID vs. DFAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF (FID) is 3.00%, while Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF (DFAX) has a volatility of 5.27%. This indicates that FID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIDDFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

5.27%

-2.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.12%

12.67%

-4.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.16%

14.83%

-4.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.04%

15.99%

+1.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.96%

15.99%

+2.97%

FID vs. DFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FID has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

FID vs. DFAX - Dividend Comparison

FID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.02%, more than DFAX's 2.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
DFAX
Dimensional World ex US Core Equity 2 ETF
2.22%2.58%2.98%3.01%3.30%1.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FID
First Trust S&P International Dividend Aristocrats ETF
4.02%4.30%4.31%4.19%4.22%3.76%3.91%3.70%1.74%

Frequently Asked Questions


FID and DFAX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DFAX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to FID (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FID dropped -39.79% vs DFAX's -28.15%.

On 3-year performance, DFAX leads with 20.90% vs 17.43% for FID. On fees, DFAX is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, FID has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFAX has performed better with a 20.90% return vs 17.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFAX is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FID.

FID has the higher dividend yield at 4.02%, compared with 2.22% for DFAX.

FID tracks S&P International Dividend Aristocrats Index, while DFAX tracks MSCI All Country World ex USA Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for FID and 0.30% for DFAX.

DFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FID and DFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer