PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FICVX vs. PISHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FICVX vs. PISHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX) and Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares (PISHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FICVX achieves a 14.07% return, which is significantly higher than PISHX's 1.85% return.


FICVX

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.63%
6M
8.16%
YTD
14.07%
1Y
25.29%
3Y*
13.96%
5Y*
7.12%
10Y*
11.93%
ALL TIME*
13.49%

PISHX

1D
-0.38%
1M
-0.96%
6M
1.06%
YTD
1.85%
1Y
5.56%
3Y*
10.17%
5Y*
3.75%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
5.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FICVX vs. PISHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FICVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I
14.07%18.28%8.11%11.39%-15.38%9.93%42.46%15.77%
PISHX
Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares
1.85%9.65%12.50%7.91%-11.73%4.30%8.57%12.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FICVX and PISHX is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2019

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FICVX vs. PISHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FICVX
FICVX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FICVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FICVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FICVX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
FICVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FICVX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

PISHX
PISHX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PISHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PISHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
PISHX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
PISHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PISHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FICVX vs. PISHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX) and Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares (PISHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FICVXPISHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.47

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.52

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

1.98

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.80

8.85

-1.05

FICVX vs. PISHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FICVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the PISHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FICVX and PISHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FICVX vs. PISHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FICVX drawdown since its inception was -25.06%, smaller than the maximum PISHX drawdown of -27.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICVX and PISHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FICVXPISHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.06%

-27.12%

+2.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.70%

-2.83%

-8.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.88%

-3.90%

-14.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.20%

-19.14%

-5.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.04%

-1.05%

-7.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.62%

-3.86%

-1.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

0.63%

+2.40%

Volatility

FICVX vs. PISHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I (FICVX) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares (PISHX) at 0.62%. This indicates that FICVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PISHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FICVXPISHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.99%

0.62%

+5.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.95%

2.12%

+11.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.00%

2.46%

+14.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.91%

4.58%

+9.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.86%

7.28%

+6.58%

FICVX vs. PISHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FICVX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PISHX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FICVX vs. PISHX - Dividend Comparison

FICVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.16%, more than PISHX's 5.17% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FICVX
Fidelity Advisor Convertible Securities Fund Class I
9.16%11.38%2.02%2.12%3.73%20.65%10.73%3.28%9.85%4.09%4.90%10.39%
PISHX
Cohen & Steers Preferred Securities and Income SMA Shares
5.17%5.52%5.89%5.92%5.45%4.25%4.59%3.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FICVX and PISHX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FICVX has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to PISHX (0.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FICVX dropped -25.06% vs PISHX's -27.12%.

PISHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FICVX and PISHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer