FICQX vs. KWEB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund (FICQX) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB).

FICQX is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jul 17, 2025. KWEB is a passively managed fund by CICC that tracks the performance of the CSI Overseas China Internet. It was launched on Jul 31, 2013.

Performance

FICQX vs. KWEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund (FICQX) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FICQX vs. KWEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FICQX Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund	-8.17%	0.38%
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	-16.51%	-6.22%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FICQX achieves a -8.17% return, which is significantly higher than KWEB's -16.51% return.

FICQX

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: -12.99%
• YTD: -8.17%
• 6M: -8.47%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

KWEB

• 1D: 2.34%
• 1M: -8.47%
• YTD: -16.51%
• 6M: -28.20%
• 1Y: -13.60%
• 3Y*: 0.58%
• 5Y*: -15.40%
• 10Y*: 0.04%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FICQX vs. KWEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FICQX has a 0.81% expense ratio, which is higher than KWEB's 0.76% expense ratio.

FICQX

Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund

KWEB

KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF

Return for Risk

FICQX vs. KWEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

KWEB

KWEB Risk / Return Rank: 4
KWEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
KWEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
KWEB Omega Ratio Rank: 5
KWEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
KWEB Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FICQX vs. KWEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund (FICQX) and KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF (KWEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FICQX	KWEB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	-0.46	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.32	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.79	0.07	-0.86

Correlation

The correlation between FICQX and KWEB is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FICQX vs. KWEB - Dividend Comparison

FICQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.51%, less than KWEB's 7.37% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FICQX Fidelity International Capital Appreciation Fund	6.51%	5.98%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
KWEB KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF	7.37%	6.16%	3.51%	1.71%	0.00%	7.07%	0.29%	0.08%	3.40%	0.58%	1.19%	0.46%

Drawdowns

FICQX vs. KWEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FICQX drawdown since its inception was -14.45%, smaller than the maximum KWEB drawdown of -80.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICQX and KWEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FICQX	KWEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.45%	-80.92%	+66.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-31.36%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-75.23%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-80.92%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.45%	-67.12%	+52.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.74%	-34.80%	+32.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	12.05%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FICQX	KWEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.95%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	19.07%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.44%	29.53%	-13.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.44%	47.64%	-31.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.44%	39.87%	-23.43%