FICO vs. CEG
FICO (Fair Isaac Corporation) and CEG (Constellation Energy Corp) are both stocks. FICO operates in Software - Application (Technology), while CEG operates in Utilities - Renewable (Utilities). Over the past 3 years, FICO returned 15.94%/yr vs 39.97%/yr for CEG. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FICO vs. CEG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FICO having a -28.59% return and CEG slightly lower at -28.84%.
FICO
- 1D
- 6.16%
- 1M
- 7.22%
- YTD
- -28.59%
- 6M
- -31.42%
- 1Y
- -31.98%
- 3Y*
- 15.94%
- 5Y*
- 19.71%
- 10Y*
- 26.67%
CEG
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- -17.31%
- YTD
- -28.84%
- 6M
- -29.71%
- 1Y
- -15.67%
- 3Y*
- 39.97%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FICO vs. CEG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | -28.59% | -15.08% | 71.04% | 94.46% | 20.31% |
CEG Constellation Energy Corp | -28.84% | 58.80% | 92.71% | 37.24% | 73.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between FICO and CEG is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2022 | 0.24 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FICO and CEG has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
FICO:
$28.67B
CEG:
$88.74B
FICO:
$31.51
CEG:
$8.13
FICO:
38.32
CEG:
30.85
FICO:
2.04
CEG:
0.54
FICO:
12.90
CEG:
3.27
FICO:
$2.26B
CEG:
$24.82B
FICO:
$1.90B
CEG:
$20.98B
FICO:
$1.16B
CEG:
$5.87B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FICO vs. CEG — Risk / Return Rank
FICO
CEG
FICO vs. CEG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) and Constellation Energy Corp (CEG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FICO | CEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.91 | 0.98 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.62 | -0.41 | -0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.18 | -0.84 | -0.35 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FICO | CEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.63 | -0.34 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.90 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
FICO vs. CEG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FICO drawdown since its inception was -79.26%, which is greater than CEG's maximum drawdown of -50.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICO and CEG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FICO | CEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.26% | -50.70% | -28.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -52.12% | -38.77% | -13.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.28% | -50.70% | -10.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.28% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -49.32% | -37.69% | -11.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.02% | -11.58% | -6.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 27.06% | 18.77% | +8.29% |
Volatility
FICO vs. CEG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) is 14.53%, while Constellation Energy Corp (CEG) has a volatility of 15.62%. This indicates that FICO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FICO | CEG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.53% | 15.62% | -1.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.17% | 37.45% | +1.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 50.75% | 46.57% | +4.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.72% | 49.35% | -8.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 38.08% | 49.35% | -11.27% |
Dividends
FICO vs. CEG - Dividend Comparison
FICO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CEG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CEG Constellation Energy Corp | 0.65% | 0.44% | 0.63% | 0.97% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FICO Fair Isaac Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% | 0.07% | 0.08% |
Financials
FICO vs. CEG - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fair Isaac Corporation and Constellation Energy Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FICO vs. CEG - Profitability Comparison
FICO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a gross profit of 600.48M and revenue of 691.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.8%.
CEG - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Energy Corp reported a gross profit of 2.48B and revenue of 6.07B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.8%.
FICO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported an operating income of 402.47M and revenue of 691.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 58.2%.
CEG - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Energy Corp reported an operating income of 598.00M and revenue of 6.07B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.
FICO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fair Isaac Corporation reported a net income of 264.46M and revenue of 691.68M, resulting in a net margin of 38.2%.
CEG - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Constellation Energy Corp reported a net income of 432.00M and revenue of 6.07B, resulting in a net margin of 7.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FICO and CEG have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CEG has higher volatility (15.62%) compared to FICO (14.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FICO dropped -79.26% vs CEG's -50.70%.
CEG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.34 vs -0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FICO and CEG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer