FICNX vs. MUC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FICNX (Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund) and MUC (BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, FICNX returned 1.94%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for MUC. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FICNX charges 0.48%/yr vs 2.14%/yr for MUC.

Performance

FICNX vs. MUC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund (FICNX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FICNX achieves a 1.04% return, which is significantly lower than MUC's 4.06% return. Over the past 10 years, FICNX has outperformed MUC with an annualized return of 1.94%, while MUC has yielded a comparatively lower 0.78% annualized return.

FICNX

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.58%
• YTD: 1.04%
• 6M: 1.44%
• 1Y: 6.33%
• 3Y*: 3.91%
• 5Y*: 0.94%
• 10Y*: 1.94%

MUC

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 4.06%
• 6M: 3.70%
• 1Y: 10.52%
• 3Y*: 6.28%
• 5Y*: -2.69%
• 10Y*: 0.78%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FICNX vs. MUC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FICNX Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund	1.04%	5.59%	0.56%	6.29%	-8.80%	1.56%	4.05%	8.26%	0.94%	4.20%
MUC BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund	4.06%	5.96%	0.76%	7.86%	-26.81%	7.38%	11.85%	18.12%	-9.00%	6.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FICNX and MUC is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.52
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 3, 1998	0.28

Over the past year, FICNX and MUC have become more correlated (0.50) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

FICNX vs. MUC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FICNX

FICNX Risk / Return Rank: 65
FICNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FICNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FICNX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FICNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
FICNX Martin Ratio Rank: 32

MUC

MUC Risk / Return Rank: 23
MUC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
MUC Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
MUC Omega Ratio Rank: 24
MUC Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
MUC Martin Ratio Rank: 27

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FICNX vs. MUC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund (FICNX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FICNX	MUC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	1.31	+1.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.01	2.08	+1.93
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.66	1.25	+0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.24	1.62	+0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.42	6.57	+0.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FICNX vs. MUC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FICNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is higher than the MUC Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FICNX and MUC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FICNX	MUC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.69	1.31	+1.38
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27	-0.24	+0.50
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.52	0.07	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.26	0.29	+0.97

Drawdowns

FICNX vs. MUC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FICNX drawdown since its inception was -13.29%, smaller than the maximum MUC drawdown of -48.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICNX and MUC.

Drawdown Indicators

	FICNX	MUC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-13.29%	-48.97%	+35.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.84%	-6.53%	+3.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-4.90%	-14.51%	+9.61%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.29%	-38.29%	+25.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-13.29%	-38.29%	+25.00%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	-16.50%	+15.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.71%	-9.90%	+8.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.86%	1.60%	-0.74%

Volatility

FICNX vs. MUC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund (FICNX) is 0.92%, while BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund (MUC) has a volatility of 2.37%. This indicates that FICNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FICNX	MUC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.92%	2.37%	-1.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.87%	6.24%	-4.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.37%	8.05%	-5.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.53%	11.50%	-7.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.75%	11.89%	-8.14%

FICNX vs. MUC - Expense Ratio Comparison

FICNX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than MUC's 2.14% expense ratio.

Dividends

FICNX vs. MUC - Dividend Comparison

FICNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than MUC's 5.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FICNX Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund	2.54%	3.18%	2.40%	2.43%	1.73%	1.98%	2.59%	2.77%	2.52%	3.05%	4.27%	3.26%
MUC BlackRock MuniHoldings California Quality Fund	5.97%	6.06%	5.62%	3.84%	5.79%	4.27%	3.96%	3.90%	4.99%	5.14%	5.45%	5.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FICNX and MUC in my portfolio?

FICNX and MUC have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FICNX or MUC?

MUC has higher volatility (2.37%) compared to FICNX (0.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FICNX dropped -13.29% vs MUC's -48.97%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FICNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.69 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.