FICNX vs. ATOIX
FICNX (Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund) and ATOIX (abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, FICNX returned 1.87%/yr vs 1.79%/yr for ATOIX. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FICNX charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.44%/yr for ATOIX.
Performance
FICNX vs. ATOIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FICNX achieves a 1.13% return, which is significantly higher than ATOIX's 1.01% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FICNX having a 1.87% annualized return and ATOIX not far behind at 1.79%.
FICNX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.40%
- YTD
- 1.13%
- 6M
- 1.44%
- 1Y
- 5.94%
- 3Y*
- 3.88%
- 5Y*
- 0.94%
- 10Y*
- 1.87%
ATOIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 6M
- 1.54%
- 1Y
- 3.02%
- 3Y*
- 3.08%
- 5Y*
- 2.30%
- 10Y*
- 1.79%
FICNX vs. ATOIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FICNX Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund | 1.13% | 5.59% | 0.56% | 6.29% | -8.80% | 1.56% | 4.05% | 8.26% | 0.94% | 4.20% |
ATOIX abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund | 1.01% | 3.33% | 3.14% | 3.27% | 0.87% | -0.04% | 0.88% | 1.40% | 1.54% | 2.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between FICNX and ATOIX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2002 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FICNX vs. ATOIX — Risk / Return Rank
FICNX
ATOIX
FICNX vs. ATOIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund (FICNX) and abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FICNX | ATOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -13.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.60 | 10.98 | -9.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.10 | 30.48 | -28.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.77 | 89.66 | -82.89 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FICNX vs. ATOIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FICNX drawdown since its inception was -13.29%, which is greater than ATOIX's maximum drawdown of -1.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICNX and ATOIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FICNX | ATOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.29% | -1.46% | -11.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.84% | -0.10% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.90% | -0.10% | -4.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.29% | -0.37% | -12.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -13.29% | -0.43% | -12.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | 0.00% | -0.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.71% | -0.06% | -1.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.88% | 0.03% | +0.85% |
Volatility
FICNX vs. ATOIX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund (FICNX) has a higher volatility of 0.66% compared to abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund (ATOIX) at 0.20%. This indicates that FICNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ATOIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FICNX | ATOIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.66% | 0.20% | +0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.87% | 0.61% | +1.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36% | 0.87% | +1.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.53% | 0.83% | +2.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.75% | 0.79% | +2.96% |
FICNX vs. ATOIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FICNX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than ATOIX's 0.44% expense ratio.
Dividends
FICNX vs. ATOIX - Dividend Comparison
FICNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than ATOIX's 2.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATOIX abrdn Ultra Short Municipal Income Fund | 2.98% | 3.27% | 3.09% | 3.02% | 1.07% | 0.06% | 0.88% | 1.39% | 1.42% | 2.20% | 0.61% | 0.52% |
FICNX Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund | 2.54% | 3.18% | 2.40% | 2.43% | 1.73% | 1.98% | 2.59% | 2.77% | 2.52% | 3.05% | 4.27% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FICNX and ATOIX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FICNX has higher volatility (0.66%) compared to ATOIX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FICNX dropped -13.29% vs ATOIX's -1.46%.
ATOIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.50 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FICNX and ATOIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer