PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FICNX vs. FTABX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FICNX vs. FTABX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund (FICNX) and Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FICNX achieves a 0.86% return, which is significantly lower than FTABX's 1.43% return. Over the past 10 years, FICNX has underperformed FTABX with an annualized return of 1.92%, while FTABX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.36% annualized return.


FICNX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.31%
YTD
0.86%
6M
1.34%
1Y
6.14%
3Y*
3.85%
5Y*
0.90%
10Y*
1.92%

FTABX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.55%
YTD
1.43%
6M
1.90%
1Y
7.47%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
1.01%
10Y*
2.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FICNX vs. FTABX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FICNX
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund
0.86%5.59%0.56%6.29%-8.80%1.56%4.05%8.26%0.94%4.20%
FTABX
Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund
1.43%5.60%1.54%7.51%-10.74%2.20%4.80%8.58%0.67%6.45%

Correlation

The correlation between FICNX and FTABX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2001

0.90

The correlation between FICNX and FTABX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FICNX vs. FTABX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FICNX
FICNX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FICNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FICNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FICNX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FICNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
FICNX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank

FTABX
FTABX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FTABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTABX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FTABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTABX Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FICNX vs. FTABX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund (FICNX) and Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FICNXFTABXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.52

2.65

-0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.74

4.16

-0.42

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

1.65

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.18

2.43

-0.26

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.24

8.40

-1.16

FICNX vs. FTABX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FICNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the FTABX Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FICNX and FTABX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FICNXFTABXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.65

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

0.24

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.55

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.26

1.05

+0.21

Drawdowns

FICNX vs. FTABX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FICNX drawdown since its inception was -13.29%, smaller than the maximum FTABX drawdown of -16.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICNX and FTABX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FICNXFTABXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.29%

-16.14%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.84%

-3.11%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.90%

-5.99%

+1.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.29%

-16.14%

+2.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.29%

-16.14%

+2.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.05%

-0.78%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.71%

-2.12%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

0.90%

-0.05%

Volatility

FICNX vs. FTABX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund (FICNX) is 0.91%, while Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund (FTABX) has a volatility of 1.08%. This indicates that FICNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTABX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FICNXFTABXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.91%

1.08%

-0.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.89%

2.16%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37%

2.76%

-0.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.53%

4.16%

-0.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.75%

4.29%

-0.54%

FICNX vs. FTABX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FICNX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than FTABX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FICNX vs. FTABX - Dividend Comparison

FICNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than FTABX's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FICNX
Fidelity Connecticut Municipal Income Fund
2.55%3.18%2.40%2.43%1.73%1.98%2.59%2.77%2.52%3.05%4.27%3.26%
FTABX
Fidelity Tax-Free Bond Fund
3.21%4.18%2.81%2.90%2.16%2.27%2.64%2.94%3.01%3.49%4.22%3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


FICNX and FTABX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTABX has higher volatility (1.08%) compared to FICNX (0.91%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FICNX dropped -13.29% vs FTABX's -16.14%.

FTABX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FICNX and FTABX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer