PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FICGX vs. FCGSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FICGX vs. FCGSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Delaware Growth Equity Fund (FICGX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FICGX achieves a 11.93% return, which is significantly lower than FCGSX's 23.66% return. Over the past 10 years, FICGX has underperformed FCGSX with an annualized return of 13.77%, while FCGSX has yielded a comparatively higher 24.64% annualized return.


FICGX

1D
0.00%
1M
4.15%
YTD
11.93%
6M
11.36%
1Y
29.78%
3Y*
23.63%
5Y*
7.98%
10Y*
13.77%

FCGSX

1D
-0.21%
1M
7.43%
YTD
23.66%
6M
24.81%
1Y
55.55%
3Y*
34.64%
5Y*
19.47%
10Y*
24.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FICGX vs. FCGSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FICGX
Delaware Growth Equity Fund
11.93%20.49%23.76%28.68%-24.65%5.54%28.41%24.12%-3.89%32.19%
FCGSX
Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund
23.66%25.52%38.00%45.97%-32.15%25.13%70.01%39.75%-4.03%37.69%

Correlation

The correlation between FICGX and FCGSX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 20, 2013

0.88

The correlation between FICGX and FCGSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FICGX vs. FCGSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FICGX
FICGX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FICGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FICGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FICGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FICGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FICGX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

FCGSX
FCGSX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
FCGSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCGSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCGSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FCGSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCGSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FICGX vs. FCGSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Delaware Growth Equity Fund (FICGX) and Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FICGXFCGSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.53

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.22

5.43

-2.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.77

24.79

-11.01

FICGX vs. FCGSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FICGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is lower than the FCGSX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FICGX and FCGSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FICGXFCGSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

3.21

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

0.83

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

1.06

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

0.98

-0.68

Drawdowns

FICGX vs. FCGSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FICGX drawdown since its inception was -54.19%, which is greater than FCGSX's maximum drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICGX and FCGSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FICGXFCGSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.19%

-38.77%

-15.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.48%

-10.42%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.48%

-26.07%

+5.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.73%

-38.77%

-8.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.73%

-38.77%

-8.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.21%

+0.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.24%

-6.96%

-9.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.21%

2.28%

-0.07%

Volatility

FICGX vs. FCGSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Delaware Growth Equity Fund (FICGX) is 3.29%, while Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund (FCGSX) has a volatility of 4.43%. This indicates that FICGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCGSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FICGXFCGSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

4.43%

-1.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.14%

13.34%

-2.20%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.02%

17.65%

-3.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.12%

23.65%

-2.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.60%

23.24%

-2.64%

FICGX vs. FCGSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FICGX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FCGSX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Dividends

FICGX vs. FCGSX - Dividend Comparison

FICGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.40%, less than FCGSX's 8.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FCGSX
Fidelity Series Growth Company Fund
8.47%10.48%12.49%3.13%0.61%38.65%31.99%11.06%13.21%10.51%2.44%0.25%
FICGX
Delaware Growth Equity Fund
3.40%3.80%5.28%2.75%32.39%7.63%9.65%10.92%5.77%9.05%16.01%10.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


FICGX and FCGSX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FCGSX has higher volatility (4.43%) compared to FICGX (3.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FICGX dropped -54.19% vs FCGSX's -38.77%.

FCGSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FICGX and FCGSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer