FIAX vs. BNO
FIAX (Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - FIAX is a Nontraditional Bonds fund actively managed by Nicholas, while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Crude Oil Brent ICE Near Term Futures. FIAX is actively managed, while BNO is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FIAX returned 3.36%/yr vs 20.31%/yr for BNO. Their -0.08 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. FIAX charges 1.04%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for BNO.
Performance
FIAX vs. BNO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FIAX achieves a 1.91% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 77.90% return.
FIAX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- -0.16%
- 6M
- 1.62%
- YTD
- 1.91%
- 1Y
- 3.91%
- 3Y*
- 3.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.26%
BNO
- 1D
- 1.45%
- 1M
- 27.00%
- 6M
- 52.90%
- YTD
- 77.90%
- 1Y
- 62.83%
- 3Y*
- 20.31%
- 5Y*
- 20.89%
- 10Y*
- 15.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.31%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $107.13M | $97.34M | $147.52M | |
| $158.25K | $258.67K | $203.21K |
FIAX vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FIAX Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF | 1.91% | 2.33% | 4.67% | 3.44% | -0.37% |
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 77.90% | -5.44% | 9.67% | -3.43% | 1.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between FIAX and BNO is -0.33, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2022 | -0.08 |
Over the past year, the inverse relationship between FIAX and BNO has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.08 to -0.33, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FIAX vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank
FIAX
BNO
FIAX vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF (FIAX) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FIAX | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.24 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.90 | 1.70 | +0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.08 | 5.15 | +1.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FIAX vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FIAX drawdown since its inception was -6.26%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIAX and BNO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FIAX | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.26% | -87.06% | +80.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.40% | -34.46% | +32.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.26% | -34.46% | +28.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.46% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -16.21% | +16.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.83% | -39.99% | +39.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.64% | 11.86% | -11.22% |
Volatility
FIAX vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF (FIAX) is 0.97%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 17.47%. This indicates that FIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FIAX | BNO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.97% | 17.47% | -16.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.08% | 40.96% | -37.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.02% | 44.54% | -40.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 36.41% | -32.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.00% | 36.98% | -32.98% |
FIAX vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison
FIAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than BNO's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FIAX vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison
FIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.20%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
BNO United States Brent Oil Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FIAX Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF | 8.20% | 8.17% | 8.11% | 4.81% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FIAX and BNO have a correlation of -0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BNO has higher volatility (17.47%) compared to FIAX (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIAX dropped -6.26% vs BNO's -87.06%.
On 3-year performance, BNO leads with 20.31% vs 3.36% for FIAX. On fees, BNO is cheaper at 1.00% per year. On volatility, FIAX has been the lower-risk option at 0.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, BNO has performed better with a 20.31% return vs 3.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BNO is cheaper with a 1.00% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for FIAX.
FIAX has the higher dividend yield at 8.20%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.
FIAX is categorized as Nontraditional Bonds, while BNO is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Nicholas and USCF. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for FIAX and 1.00% for BNO.
BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FIAX and BNO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer