PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIAX vs. AMAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FIAX vs. AMAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF (FIAX) and RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FIAX vs. AMAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FIAX
Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF
-0.83%2.33%4.67%3.44%-0.30%
AMAX
RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
0.90%11.38%9.62%6.70%-1.78%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIAX achieves a -0.83% return, which is significantly lower than AMAX's 0.90% return.


FIAX

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.97%
YTD
-0.83%
6M
0.79%
1Y
2.43%
3Y*
2.82%
5Y*
10Y*

AMAX

1D
0.72%
1M
-4.72%
YTD
0.90%
6M
-0.88%
1Y
14.84%
3Y*
8.46%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FIAX vs. AMAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIAX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is lower than AMAX's 1.29% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FIAX vs. AMAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FIAX
FIAX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
FIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

AMAX
AMAX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
AMAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
AMAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FIAX vs. AMAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF (FIAX) and RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FIAXAMAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.55

1.32

-0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.80

1.81

-1.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.24

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.70

2.08

-1.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.76

6.57

-3.81

FIAX vs. AMAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the AMAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIAX and AMAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FIAXAMAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

1.32

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

0.31

+0.39

Correlation

The correlation between FIAX and AMAX is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

FIAX vs. AMAX - Dividend Comparison

FIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%, less than AMAX's 10.50% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
FIAX
Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF
8.29%8.17%8.11%4.81%0.00%0.00%
AMAX
RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF
10.50%9.18%7.36%6.99%11.22%1.00%

Drawdowns

FIAX vs. AMAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIAX drawdown since its inception was -6.26%, smaller than the maximum AMAX drawdown of -16.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIAX and AMAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FIAXAMAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.26%

-16.28%

+10.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.66%

-7.53%

+3.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-5.39%

+3.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.87%

-5.44%

+4.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.92%

2.38%

-1.46%

Volatility

FIAX vs. AMAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nicholas Fixed Income Alternative ETF (FIAX) is 1.59%, while RH Hedged Multi-Asset Income ETF (AMAX) has a volatility of 3.97%. This indicates that FIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FIAXAMAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.59%

3.97%

-2.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.16%

8.16%

-5.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.47%

11.31%

-6.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.01%

10.38%

-6.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.01%

10.38%

-6.37%