PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FIAT vs. TRIO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FIAT vs. TRIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT) and MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FIAT achieves a 20.02% return, which is significantly higher than TRIO's 6.52% return.


FIAT

1D
7.62%
1M
9.92%
6M
8.11%
YTD
20.02%
1Y
46.24%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-18.60%

TRIO

1D
0.35%
1M
0.57%
6M
5.35%
YTD
6.52%
1Y
13.07%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.23M$1.24M$1.59M
$43.78K$78.89K$68.56K

FIAT vs. TRIO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FIAT and TRIO is -0.59, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025

-0.60

The correlation between FIAT and TRIO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.60 to -0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FIAT vs. TRIO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FIAT
FIAT Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
FIAT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FIAT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FIAT Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
FIAT Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FIAT Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

TRIO
TRIO Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TRIO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRIO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRIO Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
TRIO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRIO Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FIAT vs. TRIO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT) and MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FIATTRIODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.37

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

2.77

-0.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.72

13.64

-9.92

FIAT vs. TRIO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FIAT Sharpe Ratio is 1.14, which is lower than the TRIO Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FIAT and TRIO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FIAT vs. TRIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FIAT drawdown since its inception was -70.50%, which is greater than TRIO's maximum drawdown of -9.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FIAT and TRIO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FIATTRIODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.50%

-9.88%

-60.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.22%

-4.47%

-29.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-48.27%

-0.10%

-48.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.69%

-0.75%

-44.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.53%

0.91%

+15.62%

Volatility

FIAT vs. TRIO - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (FIAT) has a higher volatility of 16.11% compared to MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF (TRIO) at 1.93%. This indicates that FIAT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FIATTRIODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.11%

1.93%

+14.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

45.18%

5.17%

+40.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.24%

6.39%

+47.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

60.12%

10.31%

+49.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

60.12%

10.31%

+49.81%

FIAT vs. TRIO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FIAT has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than TRIO's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

FIAT vs. TRIO - Dividend Comparison

FIAT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 101.18%, more than TRIO's 8.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FIAT
YieldMax Short COIN Option Income Strategy ETF
101.18%178.11%70.99%
TRIO
MC Trio Equity Buffered ETF
8.46%9.01%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FIAT and TRIO have a correlation of -0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FIAT has higher volatility (16.11%) compared to TRIO (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FIAT dropped -70.50% vs TRIO's -9.88%.

On 1-year performance, FIAT leads with 46.24% vs 13.07% for TRIO. On fees, TRIO is cheaper at 0.70% per year. On volatility, TRIO has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FIAT has performed better with a 46.24% return vs 13.07%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TRIO is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for FIAT.

FIAT has the higher dividend yield at 101.18%, compared with 8.46% for TRIO.

FIAT is categorized as Derivative Income, while TRIO is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and McCarthy & Cox. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for FIAT and 0.70% for TRIO.

TRIO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FIAT and TRIO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer