FHYSX vs. CIF
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX) and MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF).
FHYSX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Dec 24, 2008. CIF is a passively managed fund by MFS that tracks the performance of the Barclays U.S. High-Yield Corporate 2% Issuer Capped Index. It was launched on Jul 21, 1988.
Performance
FHYSX vs. CIF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FHYSX vs. CIF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHYSX Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio | -1.76% | 9.14% | 6.42% | 12.77% | -13.16% | 4.49% | 6.08% | 15.14% | -2.16% | 8.34% |
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | -2.21% | 8.97% | 11.42% | 11.85% | -32.24% | 17.80% | 0.27% | 43.26% | -19.93% | 25.66% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHYSX achieves a -1.76% return, which is significantly higher than CIF's -2.21% return. Over the past 10 years, FHYSX has underperformed CIF with an annualized return of 5.39%, while CIF has yielded a comparatively higher 6.17% annualized return.
FHYSX
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -2.27%
- YTD
- -1.76%
- 6M
- 0.01%
- 1Y
- 5.88%
- 3Y*
- 7.48%
- 5Y*
- 3.11%
- 10Y*
- 5.39%
CIF
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- YTD
- -2.21%
- 6M
- -3.39%
- 1Y
- 5.09%
- 3Y*
- 9.56%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- 6.17%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FHYSX vs. CIF - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHYSX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than CIF's 1.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FHYSX vs. CIF — Risk / Return Rank
FHYSX
CIF
FHYSX vs. CIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX) and MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHYSX | CIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.67 | 0.38 | +1.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.37 | 0.60 | +1.77 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.09 | +0.36 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.36 | 0.51 | +1.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.71 | 1.92 | +7.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHYSX | CIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.67 | 0.38 | +1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.05 | +0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 | 0.32 | +0.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.85 | 0.16 | +0.70 |
Correlation
The correlation between FHYSX and CIF is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FHYSX vs. CIF - Dividend Comparison
FHYSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.82%, less than CIF's 10.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHYSX Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio | 5.82% | 6.28% | 5.84% | 5.30% | 5.27% | 4.54% | 5.74% | 6.18% | 6.61% | 6.98% | 6.45% | 8.45% |
CIF MFS Intermediate High Income Fund | 10.96% | 10.46% | 10.23% | 10.02% | 11.22% | 8.40% | 9.01% | 8.63% | 11.71% | 9.16% | 9.91% | 10.05% |
Drawdowns
FHYSX vs. CIF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHYSX drawdown since its inception was -21.45%, smaller than the maximum CIF drawdown of -69.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHYSX and CIF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHYSX | CIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.45% | -69.23% | +47.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.50% | -9.68% | +7.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.93% | -44.92% | +27.99% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.45% | -45.24% | +23.79% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.27% | -23.30% | +21.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.61% | -17.80% | +15.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | 2.65% | -2.04% |
Volatility
FHYSX vs. CIF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federated Hermes High-Yield Strategy Portfolio (FHYSX) is 1.24%, while MFS Intermediate High Income Fund (CIF) has a volatility of 5.35%. This indicates that FHYSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FHYSX | CIF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.24% | 5.35% | -4.11% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.37% | 7.87% | -5.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76% | 13.40% | -9.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.20% | 16.85% | -11.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.76% | 19.43% | -13.67% |