FHYS vs. PSH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FHYS (Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF) and PSH (PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FHYS returned 6.49% vs 6.11% for PSH. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FHYS charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for PSH.

Performance

FHYS vs. PSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS) and PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHYS achieves a 1.48% return, which is significantly lower than PSH's 1.88% return.

FHYS

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 0.46%
• YTD: 1.48%
• 6M: 1.89%
• 1Y: 6.49%
• 3Y*: 7.83%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PSH

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 1.88%
• 6M: 2.38%
• 1Y: 6.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHYS vs. PSH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FHYS Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF	1.48%	7.72%	7.23%	0.32%
PSH PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF	1.88%	7.34%	7.96%	0.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FHYS and PSH is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2023	0.70

The correlation between FHYS and PSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

FHYS vs. PSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FHYS	PSH
Communication Services	91.7%	-
Industrials	8.3%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	0.1%
Financial Services	-	1.3%
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FHYS vs. PSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHYS

FHYS Risk / Return Rank: 82
FHYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
FHYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FHYS Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FHYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FHYS Martin Ratio Rank: 89

PSH

PSH Risk / Return Rank: 71
PSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
PSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
PSH Omega Ratio Rank: 72
PSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
PSH Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHYS vs. PSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS) and PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHYS	PSH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.44	2.04	+0.41
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.82	3.19	+0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.52	1.43	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.92	4.33	-0.41
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.21	12.80	+7.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHYS vs. PSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHYS Sharpe Ratio is 2.44, which is comparable to the PSH Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHYS and PSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHYS	PSH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.44	2.04	+0.41
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.91	2.21	-1.30

Drawdowns

FHYS vs. PSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHYS drawdown since its inception was -11.62%, which is greater than PSH's maximum drawdown of -3.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHYS and PSH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHYS	PSH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.62%	-3.06%	-8.56%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.66%	-1.42%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.16%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	-0.16%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.29%	-0.27%	-2.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.32%	0.48%	-0.16%

Volatility

FHYS vs. PSH - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS) has a higher volatility of 0.76% compared to PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH) at 0.69%. This indicates that FHYS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHYS	PSH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.76%	0.69%	+0.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.18%	2.10%	+0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.67%	3.02%	-0.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.95%	3.26%	+1.69%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.95%	3.26%	+1.69%

FHYS vs. PSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHYS has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than PSH's 0.45% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHYS vs. PSH - Dividend Comparison

FHYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, less than PSH's 6.66% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FHYS Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF	5.77%	5.96%	6.42%	6.76%	6.25%	0.16%
PSH PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF	6.66%	6.62%	8.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHYS and PSH in my portfolio?

FHYS and PSH have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FHYS or PSH?

FHYS has higher volatility (0.76%) compared to PSH (0.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHYS dropped -11.62% vs PSH's -3.06%.

Which ETF is better, FHYS or PSH?

On 1-year performance, FHYS leads with 6.49% vs 6.11% for PSH. On fees, PSH is cheaper at 0.45% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FHYS or PSH?

Over the 1-year period, FHYS has performed better with a 6.49% return vs 6.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FHYS or PSH?

PSH is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for FHYS.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FHYS or PSH?

PSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.66%, compared with 5.77% for FHYS.

What is the main difference between FHYS and PSH?

They also come from different issuers: Federated and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for FHYS and 0.45% for PSH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHYS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.