PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHYS vs. JPHY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHYS vs. JPHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS) and JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF (JPHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHYS achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than JPHY's 2.06% return.


FHYS

1D
0.11%
1M
0.46%
YTD
1.59%
6M
2.04%
1Y
6.40%
3Y*
7.91%
5Y*
10Y*

JPHY

1D
-0.01%
1M
0.35%
YTD
2.06%
6M
2.42%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHYS vs. JPHY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FHYS and JPHY is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025

0.76

FHYS vs. JPHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FHYS
JPHY

Communication Services

91.7%
15.8%

Industrials

8.3%
10.8%

Basic Materials

-

3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

8.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.4%

Energy

-

7.0%

Financial Services

-

1.8%

Healthcare

-

5.1%

Real Estate

-

3.0%

Technology

-

4.8%

Utilities

-

2.8%

Communication Services

FHYS
91.7%
JPHY
15.8%

Industrials

FHYS
8.3%
JPHY
10.8%

Basic Materials

FHYS

-

JPHY
3.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FHYS

-

JPHY
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

FHYS

-

JPHY
2.4%

Energy

FHYS

-

JPHY
7.0%

Financial Services

FHYS

-

JPHY
1.8%

Healthcare

FHYS

-

JPHY
5.1%

Real Estate

FHYS

-

JPHY
3.0%

Technology

FHYS

-

JPHY
4.8%

Utilities

FHYS

-

JPHY
2.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHYS vs. JPHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHYS
FHYS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FHYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHYS Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
FHYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHYS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

JPHY
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHYS vs. JPHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS) and JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF (JPHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHYSJPHYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.93

FHYS vs. JPHY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHYSJPHYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

2.16

-1.24

Drawdowns

FHYS vs. JPHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHYS drawdown since its inception was -11.62%, which is greater than JPHY's maximum drawdown of -1.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHYS and JPHY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHYSJPHYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.62%

-1.65%

-9.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.05%

-0.10%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.28%

-0.21%

-2.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.32%

Volatility

FHYS vs. JPHY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHYSJPHYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.76%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67%

3.04%

-0.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.94%

3.04%

+1.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.94%

3.04%

+1.90%

FHYS vs. JPHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHYS has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than JPHY's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHYS vs. JPHY - Dividend Comparison

FHYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, less than JPHY's 5.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FHYS
Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF
5.76%5.96%6.42%6.76%6.25%0.16%
JPHY
JPMorgan High Yield Research Enhanced ETF
5.92%3.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHYS and JPHY have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JPHY is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JPHY is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for FHYS.

JPHY has the higher dividend yield at 5.92%, compared with 5.76% for FHYS.

They also come from different issuers: Federated and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for FHYS and 0.24% for JPHY.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHYS and JPHY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer