PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHYEX vs. JRLVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHYEX vs. JRLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2050 Fund Class M (FHYEX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHYEX achieves a 13.16% return, which is significantly higher than JRLVX's 11.90% return.


FHYEX

1D
0.37%
1M
2.14%
YTD
13.16%
6M
14.29%
1Y
28.59%
3Y*
20.36%
5Y*
9.73%
10Y*

JRLVX

1D
0.33%
1M
2.12%
YTD
11.90%
6M
12.35%
1Y
26.25%
3Y*
18.85%
5Y*
9.32%
10Y*
11.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHYEX vs. JRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHYEX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2050 Fund Class M
13.16%22.00%15.33%19.88%-19.45%15.75%17.15%25.82%-12.04%
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
11.90%19.25%14.50%18.00%-18.06%18.45%16.23%25.03%-11.95%

Correlation

The correlation between FHYEX and JRLVX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.98

The correlation between FHYEX and JRLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHYEX vs. JRLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHYEX
FHYEX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
FHYEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHYEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHYEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FHYEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHYEX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

JRLVX
JRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
JRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
JRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
JRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
JRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHYEX vs. JRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2050 Fund Class M (FHYEX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHYEXJRLVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.44

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

3.17

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.46

14.06

-0.61

FHYEX vs. JRLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHYEX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the JRLVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHYEX and JRLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHYEXJRLVXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.32

2.39

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.63

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.68

0.65

+0.03

Drawdowns

FHYEX vs. JRLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHYEX drawdown since its inception was -31.36%, roughly equal to the maximum JRLVX drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHYEX and JRLVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHYEXJRLVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.36%

-32.53%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-8.50%

-1.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

-15.27%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.21%

-25.64%

-2.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.24%

-0.38%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.10%

-4.56%

-1.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

1.91%

+0.26%

Volatility

FHYEX vs. JRLVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2050 Fund Class M (FHYEX) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) at 3.33%. This indicates that FHYEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JRLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHYEXJRLVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.12%

3.33%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.34%

8.98%

+1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.63%

11.29%

+1.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.10%

14.77%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.88%

15.98%

+0.90%

FHYEX vs. JRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHYEX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than JRLVX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHYEX vs. JRLVX - Dividend Comparison

FHYEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, less than JRLVX's 3.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHYEX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2050 Fund Class M
3.08%2.21%4.19%1.54%5.89%8.09%4.42%2.95%3.45%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JRLVX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio
3.18%3.55%1.89%2.24%8.03%6.00%4.26%8.99%10.96%4.29%3.40%1.90%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FHYEX and JRLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHYEX has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to JRLVX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHYEX dropped -31.36% vs JRLVX's -32.53%.

JRLVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHYEX and JRLVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer