PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHRFX vs. FCQTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHRFX vs. FCQTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K6 (FHRFX) and American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHRFX achieves a 6.39% return, which is significantly lower than FCQTX's 10.65% return.


FHRFX

1D
0.17%
1M
0.74%
YTD
6.39%
6M
6.93%
1Y
15.26%
3Y*
11.22%
5Y*
4.65%
10Y*

FCQTX

1D
0.13%
1M
1.82%
YTD
10.65%
6M
11.12%
1Y
25.63%
3Y*
19.78%
5Y*
9.97%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHRFX vs. FCQTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FHRFX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K6
6.39%13.52%7.26%12.21%-15.50%8.21%28.28%
FCQTX
American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund
10.65%20.74%15.64%21.56%-19.63%17.34%47.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FHRFX and FCQTX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.87

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2020

0.91

The correlation between FHRFX and FCQTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHRFX vs. FCQTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHRFX
FHRFX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FHRFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHRFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHRFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FHRFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHRFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank

FCQTX
FCQTX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FCQTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FCQTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FCQTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FCQTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FCQTX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHRFX vs. FCQTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K6 (FHRFX) and American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHRFXFCQTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.39

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.00

2.61

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.02

11.86

+1.16

FHRFX vs. FCQTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHRFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the FCQTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHRFX and FCQTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHRFXFCQTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.13

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.68

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.76

1.12

-0.36

Drawdowns

FHRFX vs. FCQTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHRFX drawdown since its inception was -21.45%, smaller than the maximum FCQTX drawdown of -27.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHRFX and FCQTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHRFXFCQTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.45%

-27.34%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.08%

-9.83%

+4.75%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.09%

-15.53%

+8.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.45%

-27.34%

+5.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.19%

-0.45%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.84%

-5.88%

+1.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

2.16%

-0.99%

Volatility

FHRFX vs. FCQTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K6 (FHRFX) is 2.35%, while American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund (FCQTX) has a volatility of 3.59%. This indicates that FHRFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCQTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHRFXFCQTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.35%

3.59%

-1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.28%

9.64%

-4.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.38%

12.03%

-5.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.19%

14.72%

-6.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.19%

15.04%

-5.85%

FHRFX vs. FCQTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHRFX has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than FCQTX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHRFX vs. FCQTX - Dividend Comparison

FHRFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than FCQTX's 4.22% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
FCQTX
American Funds 2065 Target Date Retirement Fund
4.22%4.67%2.80%1.99%3.96%1.54%0.72%0.00%
FHRFX
Fidelity Managed Retirement 2025 Fund Class K6
3.89%2.79%3.26%2.80%4.93%5.33%3.81%2.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FHRFX and FCQTX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FCQTX has higher volatility (3.59%) compared to FHRFX (2.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHRFX dropped -21.45% vs FCQTX's -27.34%.

FHRFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHRFX and FCQTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer