PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHQFX vs. FHCOX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHQFX vs. FHCOX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Treasury Bill Index Fund (FHQFX) and Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund (FHCOX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHQFX achieves a 1.41% return, which is significantly lower than FHCOX's 1.54% return.


FHQFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.31%
YTD
1.41%
6M
1.84%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
4.67%
5Y*
3.04%
10Y*

FHCOX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.54%
6M
1.91%
1Y
4.48%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
3.47%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHQFX vs. FHCOX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FHQFX
Fidelity Series Treasury Bill Index Fund
1.41%4.37%5.56%4.47%-0.50%0.01%
FHCOX
Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund
1.54%4.94%5.34%4.80%0.76%0.14%

Correlation

The correlation between FHQFX and FHCOX is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2021

0.30

Over the past year, FHQFX and FHCOX have become more correlated (0.54) than their long-term average of 0.30, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHQFX vs. FHCOX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHQFX
FHQFX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FHQFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHQFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHQFX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FHQFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHQFX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

FHCOX
FHCOX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FHCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FHCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHQFX vs. FHCOX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Treasury Bill Index Fund (FHQFX) and Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund (FHCOX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHQFXFHCOXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+15.88

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

20.94

4.67

+16.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

41.79

14.99

+26.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

119.47

78.37

+41.10

FHQFX vs. FHCOX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHQFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.68, which is comparable to the FHCOX Sharpe Ratio of 3.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHQFX and FHCOX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHQFXFHCOXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.68

3.37

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.46

2.41

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.31

2.36

-0.06

Drawdowns

FHQFX vs. FHCOX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHQFX drawdown since its inception was -0.70%, which is greater than FHCOX's maximum drawdown of -0.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHQFX and FHCOX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHQFXFHCOXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.70%

-0.59%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.10%

-0.30%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.70%

-0.50%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.70%

-0.59%

-0.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.09%

-0.10%

+0.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

0.06%

-0.03%

Volatility

FHQFX vs. FHCOX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Treasury Bill Index Fund (FHQFX) is 0.31%, while Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund (FHCOX) has a volatility of 0.40%. This indicates that FHQFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHCOX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHQFXFHCOXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.31%

0.40%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.80%

0.91%

-0.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.14%

1.33%

-0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.26%

1.44%

-0.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.19%

1.40%

-0.21%

FHQFX vs. FHCOX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHQFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FHCOX's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FHQFX vs. FHCOX - Dividend Comparison

FHQFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.89%, less than FHCOX's 4.38% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
FHCOX
Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund
4.38%4.61%4.99%4.17%1.26%0.24%0.00%
FHQFX
Fidelity Series Treasury Bill Index Fund
3.89%4.16%5.09%4.67%0.00%0.01%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHQFX and FHCOX have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHCOX has higher volatility (0.40%) compared to FHQFX (0.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHQFX dropped -0.70% vs FHCOX's -0.59%.

FHQFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.68 vs 3.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHQFX and FHCOX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer