FHOFX vs. SCHG
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FHOFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG).
FHOFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 17, 2018. SCHG is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. It was launched on Dec 11, 2009.
Performance
FHOFX vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FHOFX vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHOFX Fidelity Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund | -9.76% | 18.55% | 33.37% | 42.77% | -29.13% | 27.68% | 38.39% | 36.38% | -15.37% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | -9.73% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -14.86% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FHOFX having a -9.76% return and SCHG slightly higher at -9.73%.
FHOFX
- 1D
- 3.74%
- 1M
- -5.51%
- YTD
- -9.76%
- 6M
- -9.24%
- 1Y
- 17.79%
- 3Y*
- 21.20%
- 5Y*
- 12.44%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHG
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -4.46%
- YTD
- -9.73%
- 6M
- -8.15%
- 1Y
- 17.00%
- 3Y*
- 22.30%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 16.95%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FHOFX vs. SCHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHOFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than SCHG's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FHOFX vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
FHOFX
SCHG
FHOFX vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FHOFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHOFX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.84 | 0.76 | +0.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.36 | 1.24 | +0.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.17 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 1.09 | +0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.03 | 3.71 | +0.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHOFX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 | 0.76 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.57 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.79 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 0.79 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between FHOFX and SCHG is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FHOFX vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
FHOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, more than SCHG's 0.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHOFX Fidelity Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 1.08% | 0.97% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 1.41% | 3.02% | 2.91% | 1.30% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.43% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
FHOFX vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHOFX drawdown since its inception was -32.62%, smaller than the maximum SCHG drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHOFX and SCHG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHOFX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.62% | -34.59% | +1.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.13% | -16.41% | +0.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.62% | -34.59% | +1.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.99% | -12.51% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.56% | -5.22% | -2.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.69% | 4.84% | -0.15% |
Volatility
FHOFX vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Series Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FHOFX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) have volatilities of 6.72% and 6.77%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FHOFX | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.72% | 6.77% | -0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.39% | 12.54% | -0.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.59% | 22.45% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.56% | 22.31% | -0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.30% | 21.51% | +1.79% |