FHMIX vs. NMI
FHMIX (Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund) and NMI (Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc.) are both Municipal Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, FHMIX returned 1.14%/yr vs 2.69%/yr for NMI. At a 0.07 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FHMIX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.72%/yr for NMI.
Performance
FHMIX vs. NMI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHMIX achieves a 1.11% return, which is significantly lower than NMI's 11.65% return.
FHMIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.21%
- YTD
- 1.11%
- 6M
- 1.37%
- 1Y
- 2.85%
- 3Y*
- 1.86%
- 5Y*
- 1.14%
- 10Y*
- —
NMI
- 1D
- 1.25%
- 1M
- 11.12%
- YTD
- 11.65%
- 6M
- 11.63%
- 1Y
- 16.67%
- 3Y*
- 8.46%
- 5Y*
- 2.69%
- 10Y*
- 2.55%
FHMIX vs. NMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHMIX Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund | 1.11% | 3.09% | 1.19% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.02% |
NMI Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. | 11.65% | 10.52% | 7.03% | 1.90% | -15.09% | 0.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between FHMIX and NMI is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2021 | 0.07 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FHMIX vs. NMI — Risk / Return Rank
FHMIX
NMI
FHMIX vs. NMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX) and Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHMIX | NMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +9.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 5.69 | 1.27 | +4.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 28.50 | 1.53 | +26.97 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 77.58 | 3.59 | +73.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHMIX | NMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.19 | 1.05 | +2.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.45 | 0.19 | +1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.44 | 0.34 | +1.10 |
Drawdowns
FHMIX vs. NMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHMIX drawdown since its inception was -0.50%, smaller than the maximum NMI drawdown of -28.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHMIX and NMI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHMIX | NMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.50% | -28.92% | +28.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.10% | -10.96% | +10.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.50% | -14.54% | +14.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.50% | -28.92% | +28.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.06% | +1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.06% | -5.92% | +5.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.04% | 4.65% | -4.61% |
Volatility
FHMIX vs. NMI - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX) is 0.21%, while Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. (NMI) has a volatility of 7.35%. This indicates that FHMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FHMIX | NMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.21% | 7.35% | -7.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.56% | 13.32% | -12.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89% | 15.90% | -15.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.79% | 14.46% | -13.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.79% | 14.93% | -14.14% |
FHMIX vs. NMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHMIX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than NMI's 0.72% expense ratio.
Dividends
FHMIX vs. NMI - Dividend Comparison
FHMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.80%, less than NMI's 4.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHMIX Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund | 2.80% | 3.04% | 1.18% | 0.32% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NMI Nuveen Municipal Income Fund, Inc. | 4.19% | 4.59% | 4.63% | 4.04% | 3.51% | 3.22% | 3.53% | 4.15% | 5.12% | 4.21% | 4.45% | 4.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FHMIX and NMI have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NMI has higher volatility (7.35%) compared to FHMIX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHMIX dropped -0.50% vs NMI's -28.92%.
FHMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.19 vs 1.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FHMIX and NMI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer