FHMIX vs. FGSAX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

FHMIX (Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund) and FGSAX (Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - FHMIX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Federated, while FGSAX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Federated. Over the past 5 years, FHMIX returned 1.18%/yr vs 7.92%/yr for FGSAX. Their 0.07 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FHMIX charges 0.05%/yr vs 1.15%/yr for FGSAX.

Performance

FHMIX vs. FGSAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX) and Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHMIX achieves a 1.33% return, which is significantly higher than FGSAX's 0.92% return.

FHMIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 1.03%
• YTD: 1.33%
• 1Y: 2.49%
• 3Y*: 1.97%
• 5Y*: 1.18%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.14%

FGSAX

• 1D: 1.93%
• 1M: 0.20%
• 6M: 2.15%
• YTD: 0.92%
• 1Y: 0.22%
• 3Y*: 17.86%
• 5Y*: 7.92%
• 10Y*: 14.63%
• ALL TIME*: 10.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FGSAX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FHMIX Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FHMIX vs. FGSAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FHMIX Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund	1.33%	3.09%	1.19%	0.32%	0.00%	0.02%
FGSAX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund	0.92%	10.54%	32.97%	27.05%	-24.60%	17.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FHMIX and FGSAX is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.13
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2021	0.07

Return for Risk

FHMIX vs. FGSAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FHMIX

FHMIX Risk / Return Rank: 99
FHMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
FHMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
FHMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 100
FHMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
FHMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 100

FGSAX

FGSAX Risk / Return Rank: 4
FGSAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FGSAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FGSAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FGSAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FGSAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FHMIX vs. FGSAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX) and Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FHMIX	FGSAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.10	-0.01	+3.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	12.36	0.12	+12.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	7.17	1.01	+6.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	25.05	-0.01	+25.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	82.74	-0.03	+82.77

FHMIX vs. FGSAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHMIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.10, which is higher than the FGSAX Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHMIX and FGSAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FHMIX vs. FGSAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHMIX drawdown since its inception was -0.50%, smaller than the maximum FGSAX drawdown of -66.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHMIX and FGSAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHMIX	FGSAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.50%	-66.17%	+65.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.10%	-13.73%	+13.63%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.50%	-24.51%	+24.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-0.50%	-35.79%	+35.29%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.19%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.76%	+3.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.06%	-16.10%	+16.04%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.03%	5.34%	-5.31%

Volatility

FHMIX vs. FGSAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund (FHMIX) is 0.00%, while Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund (FGSAX) has a volatility of 5.29%. This indicates that FHMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGSAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHMIX	FGSAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.00%	5.29%	-5.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.51%	13.59%	-13.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81%	17.92%	-17.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.80%	22.55%	-21.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.78%	22.29%	-21.51%

FHMIX vs. FGSAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHMIX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FGSAX's 1.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHMIX vs. FGSAX - Dividend Comparison

FHMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.56%, less than FGSAX's 4.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGSAX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund	4.88%	4.92%	4.32%	0.00%	2.31%	25.75%	7.07%	8.13%	14.46%	13.93%	0.89%	25.34%
FHMIX Federated Hermes Conservative Municipal Microshort Fund	2.56%	3.04%	1.18%	0.32%	0.00%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHMIX and FGSAX in my portfolio?

FHMIX and FGSAX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FHMIX or FGSAX?

FGSAX has higher volatility (5.29%) compared to FHMIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHMIX dropped -0.50% vs FGSAX's -66.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.10 vs -0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.