PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHLKX vs. FTIHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHLKX vs. FTIHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K (FHLKX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHLKX achieves a 6.80% return, which is significantly lower than FTIHX's 14.49% return.


FHLKX

1D
-0.42%
1M
1.55%
YTD
6.80%
6M
7.26%
1Y
14.90%
3Y*
10.49%
5Y*
4.34%
10Y*

FTIHX

1D
-0.90%
1M
3.71%
YTD
14.49%
6M
16.97%
1Y
31.36%
3Y*
19.53%
5Y*
8.41%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHLKX vs. FTIHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FHLKX
Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K
6.80%12.17%7.06%9.82%-14.79%5.50%10.70%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
14.49%32.59%4.98%15.49%-16.29%8.45%24.19%

Correlation

The correlation between FHLKX and FTIHX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2020

0.80

The correlation between FHLKX and FTIHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.79 (5 years) to 0.94 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHLKX vs. FTIHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHLKX
FHLKX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FHLKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

FTIHX
FTIHX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
FTIHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTIHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTIHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FTIHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTIHX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHLKX vs. FTIHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K (FHLKX) and Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHLKXFTIHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.36

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.42

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.46

2.88

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.28

11.33

+3.95

FHLKX vs. FTIHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHLKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.62, which is comparable to the FTIHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHLKX and FTIHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHLKXFTIHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.62

2.26

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.55

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.63

+0.14

Drawdowns

FHLKX vs. FTIHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHLKX drawdown since its inception was -19.09%, smaller than the maximum FTIHX drawdown of -35.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLKX and FTIHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHLKXFTIHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.09%

-35.75%

+16.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.42%

-11.25%

+6.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.64%

-13.15%

+6.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.09%

-29.99%

+10.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.90%

+0.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-7.22%

+2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

2.85%

-1.85%

Volatility

FHLKX vs. FTIHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K (FHLKX) is 2.05%, while Fidelity Total International Index Fund (FTIHX) has a volatility of 4.86%. This indicates that FHLKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTIHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHLKXFTIHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.05%

4.86%

-2.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.87%

12.05%

-7.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.83%

14.31%

-8.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.74%

15.28%

-8.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.27%

16.05%

-8.78%

FHLKX vs. FTIHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHLKX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is higher than FTIHX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHLKX vs. FTIHX - Dividend Comparison

FHLKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.86%, more than FTIHX's 2.43% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FHLKX
Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K
2.86%3.05%3.01%2.88%3.85%2.84%1.73%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FTIHX
Fidelity Total International Index Fund
2.43%2.78%2.88%2.78%2.51%2.55%1.62%2.61%2.21%0.45%0.47%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, FHLKX and FTIHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FTIHX has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to FHLKX (2.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHLKX dropped -19.09% vs FTIHX's -35.75%.

FHLKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.62 vs 2.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHLKX and FTIHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer