FHLKX vs. FSRRX
FHLKX (Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K) and FSRRX (Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FHLKX returned 4.55%/yr vs 6.34%/yr for FSRRX. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FHLKX charges 0.37%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for FSRRX.
Performance
FHLKX vs. FSRRX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHLKX achieves a 7.25% return, which is significantly lower than FSRRX's 8.69% return.
FHLKX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 2.43%
- YTD
- 7.25%
- 6M
- 7.71%
- 1Y
- 15.72%
- 3Y*
- 10.65%
- 5Y*
- 4.55%
- 10Y*
- —
FSRRX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 8.69%
- 6M
- 9.04%
- 1Y
- 16.60%
- 3Y*
- 10.12%
- 5Y*
- 6.34%
- 10Y*
- 5.64%
FHLKX vs. FSRRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHLKX Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K | 7.25% | 12.17% | 7.06% | 9.82% | -14.79% | 5.50% | 10.70% |
FSRRX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund | 8.69% | 10.45% | 5.84% | 4.59% | -3.34% | 15.84% | 6.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between FHLKX and FSRRX is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2020 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FHLKX and FSRRX has dropped to 0.46 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FHLKX vs. FSRRX — Risk / Return Rank
FHLKX
FSRRX
FHLKX vs. FSRRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K (FHLKX) and Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHLKX | FSRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.71 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.59 | 8.14 | -4.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.89 | 32.01 | -16.12 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHLKX | FSRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.74 | 3.55 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.93 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.59 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
FHLKX vs. FSRRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHLKX drawdown since its inception was -19.09%, smaller than the maximum FSRRX drawdown of -33.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLKX and FSRRX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHLKX | FSRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.09% | -33.42% | +14.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.42% | -2.05% | -2.37% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -6.64% | -5.80% | -0.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.09% | -12.78% | -6.31% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -19.93% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.72% | +0.72% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.82% | -4.21% | -0.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 0.52% | +0.48% |
Volatility
FHLKX vs. FSRRX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K (FHLKX) has a higher volatility of 1.99% compared to Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund (FSRRX) at 1.30%. This indicates that FHLKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSRRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FHLKX | FSRRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.99% | 1.30% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.86% | 3.68% | +1.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.81% | 4.71% | +1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.74% | 6.88% | -0.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.27% | 6.73% | +0.54% |
FHLKX vs. FSRRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHLKX has a 0.37% expense ratio, which is lower than FSRRX's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
FHLKX vs. FSRRX - Dividend Comparison
FHLKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, less than FSRRX's 4.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHLKX Fidelity Health Savings Fund Class K | 2.85% | 3.05% | 3.01% | 2.88% | 3.85% | 2.84% | 1.73% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FSRRX Fidelity Strategic Real Return Fund | 4.13% | 4.68% | 4.82% | 5.29% | 7.31% | 5.35% | 2.25% | 3.05% | 9.39% | 1.57% | 2.34% | 1.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FHLKX and FSRRX have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FHLKX has higher volatility (1.99%) compared to FSRRX (1.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHLKX dropped -19.09% vs FSRRX's -33.42%.
FSRRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs 2.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FHLKX and FSRRX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer