FHLFX vs. NOIAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) and Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund (NOIAX).
FHLFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 17, 2018. NOIAX is managed by Natixis. It was launched on Dec 14, 2010.
Performance
FHLFX vs. NOIAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FHLFX vs. NOIAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund | 0.99% | 31.96% | 3.67% | 18.16% | -14.17% | 11.23% | 8.09% | 21.66% | -10.70% |
NOIAX Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund | -6.51% | 32.80% | -5.28% | 18.93% | -15.88% | 8.73% | 4.06% | 24.35% | -14.85% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHLFX achieves a 0.99% return, which is significantly higher than NOIAX's -6.51% return.
FHLFX
- 1D
- 2.97%
- 1M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- 0.99%
- 6M
- 5.00%
- 1Y
- 22.99%
- 3Y*
- 14.59%
- 5Y*
- 8.30%
- 10Y*
- —
NOIAX
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- -8.31%
- YTD
- -6.51%
- 6M
- -3.11%
- 1Y
- 14.85%
- 3Y*
- 6.91%
- 5Y*
- 3.00%
- 10Y*
- 6.25%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FHLFX vs. NOIAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHLFX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than NOIAX's 1.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FHLFX vs. NOIAX — Risk / Return Rank
FHLFX
NOIAX
FHLFX vs. NOIAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) and Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund (NOIAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHLFX | NOIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.39 | 0.89 | +0.49 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.90 | 1.42 | +0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.19 | +0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | 1.15 | +0.79 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.44 | 4.53 | +2.91 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHLFX | NOIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.39 | 0.89 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.15 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.28 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.47 | 0.26 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between FHLFX and NOIAX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FHLFX vs. NOIAX - Dividend Comparison
FHLFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than NOIAX's 3.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHLFX Fidelity Series International Index Fund | 3.43% | 3.46% | 2.98% | 2.86% | 2.60% | 2.47% | 1.92% | 1.95% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NOIAX Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund | 3.32% | 3.11% | 2.96% | 1.72% | 1.77% | 1.55% | 0.24% | 2.99% | 4.56% | 1.04% | 2.07% | 2.77% |
Drawdowns
FHLFX vs. NOIAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHLFX drawdown since its inception was -33.58%, smaller than the maximum NOIAX drawdown of -53.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLFX and NOIAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHLFX | NOIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.58% | -53.97% | +20.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.37% | -14.34% | +2.97% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.36% | -38.21% | +8.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -53.97% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.18% | -11.56% | +3.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.18% | -11.64% | +5.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.97% | 4.18% | -1.21% |
Volatility
FHLFX vs. NOIAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) has a higher volatility of 7.63% compared to Natixis Funds Trust I Oakmark International Fund (NOIAX) at 6.84%. This indicates that FHLFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NOIAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FHLFX | NOIAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.63% | 6.84% | +0.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.01% | 11.47% | -0.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.06% | 20.44% | -3.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.82% | 20.32% | -4.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.63% | 22.43% | -4.80% |