FHLC vs. XIC.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO).

FHLC and XIC.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FHLC is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index. It was launched on Oct 21, 2013. XIC.TO is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Canada GR CAD. It was launched on Feb 16, 2001. Both FHLC and XIC.TO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

FHLC vs. XIC.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FHLC vs. XIC.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF	-4.97%	15.42%	2.48%	2.58%	-5.55%	20.39%	18.13%	21.94%	4.71%	23.34%
XIC.TO iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF	2.56%	37.82%	11.89%	14.28%	-12.12%	24.33%	7.73%	28.89%	-15.81%	16.52%

Different Trading Currencies

FHLC is traded in USD, while XIC.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the XIC.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHLC achieves a -4.97% return, which is significantly lower than XIC.TO's 2.56% return. Over the past 10 years, FHLC has underperformed XIC.TO with an annualized return of 9.60%, while XIC.TO has yielded a comparatively higher 11.69% annualized return.

FHLC

• 1D: 2.28%
• 1M: -7.46%
• YTD: -4.97%
• 6M: 5.95%
• 1Y: 4.53%
• 3Y*: 6.14%
• 5Y*: 5.07%
• 10Y*: 9.60%

XIC.TO

• 1D: 2.66%
• 1M: -6.14%
• YTD: 2.56%
• 6M: 10.45%
• 1Y: 39.24%
• 3Y*: 19.94%
• 5Y*: 12.11%
• 10Y*: 11.69%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHLC vs. XIC.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHLC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than XIC.TO's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

FHLC

Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF

XIC.TO

iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF

Return for Risk

FHLC vs. XIC.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHLC

FHLC Risk / Return Rank: 21
FHLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
FHLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
FHLC Omega Ratio Rank: 19
FHLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
FHLC Martin Ratio Rank: 21

XIC.TO

XIC.TO Risk / Return Rank: 94
XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
XIC.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
XIC.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 95
XIC.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
XIC.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHLC vs. XIC.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) and iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHLC	XIC.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.26	2.31	-2.05
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.48	2.99	-2.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.45	-0.39
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.51	3.63	-3.12
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.08	16.45	-15.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHLC vs. XIC.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHLC Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the XIC.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHLC and XIC.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHLC	XIC.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26	2.31	-2.05
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.34	0.72	-0.37
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.63	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.61	0.55	+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between FHLC and XIC.TO is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FHLC vs. XIC.TO - Dividend Comparison

FHLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.44%, less than XIC.TO's 2.16% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF	1.44%	1.40%	1.51%	1.40%	1.30%	1.16%	1.45%	1.18%	1.38%	1.38%	1.40%	2.07%
XIC.TO iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF	2.16%	2.23%	2.64%	2.95%	3.10%	2.44%	3.03%	3.01%	3.19%	2.49%	2.72%	3.21%

Drawdowns

FHLC vs. XIC.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHLC drawdown since its inception was -28.76%, smaller than the maximum XIC.TO drawdown of -42.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLC and XIC.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHLC	XIC.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.76%	-48.21%	+19.45%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.38%	-10.98%	+0.60%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.73%	-16.24%	-1.49%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.76%	-37.21%	+8.45%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.99%	-4.95%	-3.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.16%	-7.08%	+1.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.04%	2.44%	+2.60%

Volatility

FHLC vs. XIC.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) is 5.14%, while iShares Core S&P/TSX Capped Composite Index ETF (XIC.TO) has a volatility of 6.21%. This indicates that FHLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XIC.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHLC	XIC.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.14%	6.21%	-1.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.26%	12.03%	-1.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.61%	17.05%	+0.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.85%	17.02%	-2.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.82%	18.65%	-1.83%