FHLC vs. XHE
FHLC (Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF) and XHE (SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds - FHLC tracks the MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index while XHE tracks the S&P Health Care Equipment Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FHLC returned 9.14%/yr vs 5.73%/yr for XHE. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FHLC charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XHE.
Performance
FHLC vs. XHE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHLC achieves a -3.90% return, which is significantly higher than XHE's -11.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FHLC has outperformed XHE with an annualized return of 9.14%, while XHE has yielded a comparatively lower 5.73% annualized return.
FHLC
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- YTD
- -3.90%
- 6M
- -4.11%
- 1Y
- 14.43%
- 3Y*
- 6.14%
- 5Y*
- 4.50%
- 10Y*
- 9.14%
XHE
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -3.06%
- YTD
- -11.53%
- 6M
- -11.43%
- 1Y
- -4.18%
- 3Y*
- -6.55%
- 5Y*
- -8.19%
- 10Y*
- 5.73%
FHLC vs. XHE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF | -3.90% | 15.42% | 2.48% | 2.58% | -5.55% | 20.39% | 18.13% | 21.94% | 4.71% | 23.34% |
XHE SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF | -11.53% | -0.23% | 5.08% | -6.23% | -23.34% | 3.04% | 32.91% | 22.30% | 8.90% | 30.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between FHLC and XHE is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2013 | 0.74 |
The correlation between FHLC and XHE shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.75 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FHLC vs. XHE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FHLC
XHE
Healthcare
Financial Services
Technology
-
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Healthcare
FHLC
XHE
Financial Services
FHLC
XHE
Technology
FHLC
XHE
-
Industrials
FHLC
XHE
Basic Materials
FHLC
-
XHE
-
Communication Services
FHLC
-
XHE
Consumer Cyclical
FHLC
-
XHE
-
Consumer Defensive
FHLC
-
XHE
-
Energy
FHLC
-
XHE
-
Real Estate
FHLC
-
XHE
-
Utilities
FHLC
-
XHE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FHLC vs. XHE — Risk / Return Rank
FHLC
XHE
FHLC vs. XHE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) and SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF (XHE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHLC | XHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.98 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.40 | -0.23 | +1.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.52 | -0.52 | +4.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHLC | XHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | -0.20 | +1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 | -0.34 | +0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.55 | 0.25 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.40 | +0.20 |
Drawdowns
FHLC vs. XHE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHLC drawdown since its inception was -28.76%, smaller than the maximum XHE drawdown of -49.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHLC and XHE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHLC | XHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.76% | -49.92% | +21.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.38% | -18.29% | +7.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.87% | -32.62% | +15.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.73% | -49.92% | +32.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.76% | -49.92% | +21.16% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.96% | -41.34% | +34.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.19% | -13.27% | +8.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.11% | 8.06% | -3.95% |
Volatility
FHLC vs. XHE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF (FHLC) is 4.05%, while SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF (XHE) has a volatility of 5.69%. This indicates that FHLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XHE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FHLC | XHE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.05% | 5.69% | -1.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.11% | 15.34% | -5.23% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.33% | 21.36% | -7.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.97% | 24.40% | -9.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.81% | 22.93% | -6.12% |
FHLC vs. XHE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHLC has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XHE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
FHLC vs. XHE - Dividend Comparison
FHLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, more than XHE's 0.09% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHLC Fidelity MSCI Health Care Index ETF | 1.43% | 1.40% | 1.51% | 1.40% | 1.30% | 1.16% | 1.45% | 1.18% | 1.38% | 1.38% | 1.40% | 2.07% |
XHE SPDR S&P Health Care Equipment ETF | 0.09% | 0.08% | 0.04% | 0.03% | 0.04% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.09% | 0.78% | 0.17% | 7.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FHLC and XHE have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XHE has higher volatility (5.69%) compared to FHLC (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHLC dropped -28.76% vs XHE's -49.92%.
On 10-year performance, FHLC leads with 9.14% vs 5.73% for XHE. On fees, FHLC is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FHLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FHLC has performed better with a 9.14% return vs 5.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FHLC is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XHE.
FHLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.43%, compared with 0.09% for XHE.
FHLC tracks MSCI USA IMI Health Care Index, while XHE tracks S&P Health Care Equipment Select Industry Index. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for FHLC and 0.35% for XHE.
FHLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.01 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FHLC and XHE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer