FHKFX vs. PZIEX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FHKFX (Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund) and PZIEX (Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FHKFX returned 8.33%/yr vs 10.94%/yr for PZIEX. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FHKFX charges 0.01%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for PZIEX.

Performance

FHKFX vs. PZIEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX) and Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHKFX achieves a 34.07% return, which is significantly higher than PZIEX's 10.89% return.

FHKFX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 5.57%
• YTD: 34.07%
• 6M: 35.56%
• 1Y: 62.81%
• 3Y*: 27.22%
• 5Y*: 8.33%
• 10Y*: —

PZIEX

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: -2.13%
• YTD: 10.89%
• 6M: 12.13%
• 1Y: 34.10%
• 3Y*: 19.23%
• 5Y*: 10.94%
• 10Y*: 12.25%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHKFX vs. PZIEX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FHKFX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund	34.07%	38.51%	5.42%	12.10%	-24.50%	-4.15%	17.85%	9.64%	-8.52%
PZIEX Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class	10.89%	35.49%	4.54%	20.73%	-5.67%	6.65%	8.43%	13.57%	-5.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FHKFX and PZIEX is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.48
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2018	0.67

The correlation between FHKFX and PZIEX shifts across timeframes, from 0.48 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FHKFX vs. PZIEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHKFX

FHKFX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FHKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FHKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FHKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 86
FHKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FHKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 93

PZIEX

PZIEX Risk / Return Rank: 56
PZIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
PZIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
PZIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
PZIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
PZIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHKFX vs. PZIEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX) and Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FHKFX	PZIEX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.01	2.19	+0.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.62	2.95	+0.67
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.55	1.39	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.09	2.66	+2.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.20	8.40	+9.80

FHKFX vs. PZIEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHKFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.01, which is higher than the PZIEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHKFX and PZIEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FHKFX vs. PZIEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHKFX drawdown since its inception was -45.47%, roughly equal to the maximum PZIEX drawdown of -44.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKFX and PZIEX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHKFX	PZIEX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-45.47%	-44.59%	-0.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.54%	-12.79%	+0.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.71%	-16.40%	-0.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.10%	-24.22%	-17.88%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-44.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.82%	-7.45%	+6.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.14%	-9.56%	-7.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	4.05%	-0.55%

Volatility

FHKFX vs. PZIEX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX) has a higher volatility of 10.79% compared to Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class (PZIEX) at 5.49%. This indicates that FHKFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PZIEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHKFX	PZIEX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.79%	5.49%	+5.30%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.83%	13.46%	+5.37%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.21%	15.56%	+5.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.54%	14.87%	+4.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.93%	15.39%	+4.54%

FHKFX vs. PZIEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHKFX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than PZIEX's 1.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHKFX vs. PZIEX - Dividend Comparison

FHKFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than PZIEX's 4.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHKFX Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund	1.77%	2.38%	2.86%	2.43%	2.56%	3.46%	1.38%	2.28%	0.42%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PZIEX Pzena Emerging Markets Value Fund Institutional Class	4.33%	4.81%	7.38%	5.79%	2.08%	2.79%	1.28%	6.32%	1.28%	1.41%	0.98%	2.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHKFX and PZIEX in my portfolio?

FHKFX and PZIEX have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FHKFX or PZIEX?

FHKFX has higher volatility (10.79%) compared to PZIEX (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHKFX dropped -45.47% vs PZIEX's -44.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.