PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHKFX vs. FSPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHKFX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHKFX achieves a 35.18% return, which is significantly higher than FSPSX's 9.51% return.


FHKFX

1D
1.34%
1M
9.00%
YTD
35.18%
6M
38.31%
1Y
68.41%
3Y*
27.98%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*

FSPSX

1D
0.41%
1M
4.06%
YTD
9.51%
6M
12.14%
1Y
22.52%
3Y*
17.23%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*
9.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHKFX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHKFX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund
35.18%38.51%5.42%12.10%-24.50%-4.15%17.85%9.64%-8.52%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
9.51%31.98%3.70%18.31%-14.23%11.45%8.16%22.03%-12.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FHKFX and FSPSX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2018

0.73

The correlation between FHKFX and FSPSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHKFX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHKFX
FHKFX Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
FHKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
FHKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPSX
FSPSX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FSPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHKFX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHKFXFSPSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.65

1.27

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.49

1.91

+3.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.76

7.16

+13.60

FHKFX vs. FSPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHKFX Sharpe Ratio is 3.62, which is higher than the FSPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHKFX and FSPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHKFXFSPSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.62

1.47

+2.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.56

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.50

-0.06

Drawdowns

FHKFX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHKFX drawdown since its inception was -45.47%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKFX and FSPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHKFXFSPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.47%

-33.69%

-11.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.54%

-11.39%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.71%

-13.58%

-3.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.10%

-29.41%

-12.69%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.45%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.23%

-6.55%

-10.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.31%

3.03%

+0.28%

Volatility

FHKFX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund (FHKFX) has a higher volatility of 7.75% compared to Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) at 4.62%. This indicates that FHKFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHKFXFSPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.75%

4.62%

+3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.26%

12.04%

+4.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.01%

14.80%

+4.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.08%

15.98%

+3.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.70%

16.56%

+3.14%

FHKFX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHKFX has a 0.01% expense ratio, which is lower than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FHKFX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison

FHKFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.76%, less than FSPSX's 2.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHKFX
Fidelity Series Emerging Markets Fund
1.76%2.38%2.86%2.43%2.56%3.46%1.38%2.28%0.42%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
2.88%3.15%3.27%2.79%2.66%3.07%1.84%3.18%2.79%2.50%3.08%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHKFX and FSPSX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHKFX has higher volatility (7.75%) compared to FSPSX (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHKFX dropped -45.47% vs FSPSX's -33.69%.

FHKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHKFX and FSPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer