FHKCX vs. XPEV

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) and XPeng Inc. (XPEV).

FHKCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 1, 1995.

Performance

FHKCX vs. XPEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) and XPeng Inc. (XPEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FHKCX vs. XPEV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund	5.51%	42.56%	23.15%	-0.29%	-23.87%	-13.69%	15.81%
XPEV XPeng Inc.	-15.63%	71.57%	-18.99%	46.78%	-80.25%	17.51%	101.84%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHKCX achieves a 5.51% return, which is significantly higher than XPEV's -15.63% return.

FHKCX

• 1D: -0.67%
• 1M: -9.04%
• YTD: 5.51%
• 6M: 6.28%
• 1Y: 43.83%
• 3Y*: 19.86%
• 5Y*: 2.80%
• 10Y*: 12.16%

XPEV

• 1D: 2.33%
• 1M: -2.56%
• YTD: -15.63%
• 6M: -26.94%
• 1Y: -17.42%
• 3Y*: 15.48%
• 5Y*: -14.27%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

FHKCX vs. XPEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHKCX

FHKCX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FHKCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FHKCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FHKCX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
FHKCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
FHKCX Martin Ratio Rank: 89

XPEV

XPEV Risk / Return Rank: 31
XPEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 29
XPEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
XPEV Omega Ratio Rank: 30
XPEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
XPEV Martin Ratio Rank: 33

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHKCX vs. XPEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) and XPeng Inc. (XPEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHKCX	XPEV	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.87	-0.29	+2.15
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	-0.01	+2.43
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.00	+0.35
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.51	-0.30	+2.82
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.74	-0.60	+10.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHKCX vs. XPEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHKCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.87, which is higher than the XPEV Sharpe Ratio of -0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHKCX and XPEV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHKCX	XPEV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.87	-0.29	+2.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.12	-0.18	+0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.40	-0.04	+0.44

Correlation

The correlation between FHKCX and XPEV is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FHKCX vs. XPEV - Dividend Comparison

FHKCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, while XPEV has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHKCX Fidelity China Region Fund	1.66%	1.75%	1.39%	1.92%	1.05%	10.77%	4.85%	0.66%	0.83%	0.39%	1.35%	15.47%
XPEV XPeng Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FHKCX vs. XPEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHKCX drawdown since its inception was -61.96%, smaller than the maximum XPEV drawdown of -91.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKCX and XPEV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHKCX	XPEV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.96%	-91.12%	+29.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.94%	-43.46%	+27.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.82%	-88.35%	+34.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.80%	-76.29%	+65.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.37%	-67.56%	+47.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.12%	21.80%	-17.68%

Volatility

FHKCX vs. XPEV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity China Region Fund (FHKCX) is 9.27%, while XPeng Inc. (XPEV) has a volatility of 19.88%. This indicates that FHKCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XPEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHKCX	XPEV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.27%	19.88%	-10.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.45%	43.94%	-27.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.16%	61.50%	-38.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.97%	79.16%	-55.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.10%	84.44%	-62.34%