PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHKAX vs. WCQGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FHKAX vs. WCQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) and WCM China Quality Growth Fund (WCQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FHKAX vs. WCQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FHKAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A
8.27%42.19%22.84%-0.60%-24.09%-13.95%65.31%
WCQGX
WCM China Quality Growth Fund
-3.58%20.97%-3.03%-18.49%-26.70%4.03%64.08%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHKAX achieves a 8.27% return, which is significantly higher than WCQGX's -3.58% return.


FHKAX

1D
2.70%
1M
-6.17%
YTD
8.27%
6M
7.69%
1Y
45.99%
3Y*
20.61%
5Y*
2.65%
10Y*
12.13%

WCQGX

1D
1.40%
1M
-4.75%
YTD
-3.58%
6M
-12.57%
1Y
5.17%
3Y*
-3.22%
5Y*
-8.42%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FHKAX vs. WCQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHKAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than WCQGX's 1.50% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FHKAX vs. WCQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHKAX
FHKAX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
FHKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FHKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

WCQGX
WCQGX Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
WCQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WCQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
WCQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
WCQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
WCQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHKAX vs. WCQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) and WCM China Quality Growth Fund (WCQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHKAXWCQGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.05

0.23

+1.82

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.60

0.46

+2.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.06

+0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.91

0.26

+2.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.16

0.65

+10.52

FHKAX vs. WCQGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHKAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.05, which is higher than the WCQGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHKAX and WCQGX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHKAXWCQGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.05

0.23

+1.82

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

-0.36

+0.47

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.32

0.10

+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between FHKAX and WCQGX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FHKAX vs. WCQGX - Dividend Comparison

FHKAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.47%, less than WCQGX's 6.91% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHKAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A
1.47%1.59%1.22%1.58%0.59%10.80%4.71%0.38%0.39%0.21%0.99%15.33%
WCQGX
WCM China Quality Growth Fund
6.91%6.67%2.02%0.82%0.28%8.54%2.38%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

FHKAX vs. WCQGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHKAX drawdown since its inception was -58.62%, roughly equal to the maximum WCQGX drawdown of -59.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKAX and WCQGX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FHKAXWCQGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.62%

-59.28%

+0.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.91%

-15.08%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.04%

-57.82%

+3.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.41%

-44.45%

+36.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.15%

-34.13%

+14.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.16%

6.65%

-2.49%

Volatility

FHKAX vs. WCQGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) has a higher volatility of 9.77% compared to WCM China Quality Growth Fund (WCQGX) at 7.14%. This indicates that FHKAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WCQGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FHKAXWCQGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.77%

7.14%

+2.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.54%

15.84%

+0.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.25%

22.78%

+0.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.98%

23.45%

+0.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.10%

23.76%

-1.66%