FHJGX vs. LTTIX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FHJGX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class A) and LTTIX (MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FHJGX returned 7.78%/yr vs 3.72%/yr for LTTIX. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FHJGX charges 0.73%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for LTTIX.

Performance

FHJGX vs. LTTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class A (FHJGX) and MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHJGX achieves a 10.21% return, which is significantly higher than LTTIX's 2.74% return.

FHJGX

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 2.23%
• YTD: 10.21%
• 6M: 9.84%
• 1Y: 22.32%
• 3Y*: 16.43%
• 5Y*: 7.78%
• 10Y*: —

LTTIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 2.74%
• 6M: 2.59%
• 1Y: 8.04%
• 3Y*: 8.33%
• 5Y*: 3.72%
• 10Y*: 6.24%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHJGX vs. LTTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FHJGX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class A	10.21%	18.09%	12.72%	17.35%	-18.57%	13.82%	16.43%	25.19%	-11.26%
LTTIX MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund	2.74%	9.29%	6.73%	10.36%	-12.36%	8.61%	10.61%	17.82%	-6.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FHJGX and LTTIX is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.90
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018	0.92

The correlation between FHJGX and LTTIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHJGX vs. LTTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHJGX

FHJGX Risk / Return Rank: 71
FHJGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
FHJGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FHJGX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
FHJGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FHJGX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

LTTIX

LTTIX Risk / Return Rank: 61
LTTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
LTTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
LTTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
LTTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
LTTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHJGX vs. LTTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class A (FHJGX) and MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FHJGX	LTTIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.24	2.16	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.14	3.20	-0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.42	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.09	2.47	+0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.22	10.68	+2.54

FHJGX vs. LTTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHJGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the LTTIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHJGX and LTTIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FHJGX vs. LTTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHJGX drawdown since its inception was -29.16%, which is greater than LTTIX's maximum drawdown of -19.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHJGX and LTTIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHJGX	LTTIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.16%	-19.33%	-9.83%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.47%	-3.64%	-3.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.73%	-5.77%	-5.96%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.52%	-16.92%	-9.60%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-19.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.27%	-0.45%	+0.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.73%	-2.68%	-3.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.75%	0.84%	+0.91%

Volatility

FHJGX vs. LTTIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class A (FHJGX) has a higher volatility of 4.29% compared to MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund (LTTIX) at 1.34%. This indicates that FHJGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LTTIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHJGX	LTTIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.29%	1.34%	+2.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.75%	3.32%	+5.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.34%	4.18%	+6.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.63%	6.37%	+6.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.72%	7.24%	+7.48%

FHJGX vs. LTTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHJGX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is higher than LTTIX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHJGX vs. LTTIX - Dividend Comparison

FHJGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, less than LTTIX's 11.54% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHJGX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2035 Fund Class A	3.33%	2.69%	4.30%	1.90%	5.67%	7.75%	4.65%	3.38%	2.92%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LTTIX MFS Lifetime 2025 Fund	11.54%	8.13%	7.07%	3.30%	5.88%	7.35%	2.83%	3.68%	4.32%	3.51%	4.03%	1.82%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHJGX and LTTIX in my portfolio?

FHJGX and LTTIX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FHJGX or LTTIX?

FHJGX has higher volatility (4.29%) compared to LTTIX (1.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHJGX dropped -29.16% vs LTTIX's -19.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHJGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.