PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHIIX vs. LAFFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHIIX vs. LAFFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes High Income Bond Fund (FHIIX) and Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHIIX achieves a 1.17% return, which is significantly lower than LAFFX's 11.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FHIIX has underperformed LAFFX with an annualized return of 4.82%, while LAFFX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.94% annualized return.


FHIIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.76%
YTD
1.17%
6M
1.46%
1Y
5.27%
3Y*
7.57%
5Y*
3.21%
10Y*
4.82%

LAFFX

1D
0.31%
1M
3.29%
YTD
11.33%
6M
10.92%
1Y
24.64%
3Y*
18.60%
5Y*
11.31%
10Y*
10.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHIIX vs. LAFFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHIIX
Federated Hermes High Income Bond Fund
1.17%8.00%6.16%12.42%-11.74%4.68%5.90%14.35%-3.06%6.54%
LAFFX
Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund
11.33%15.75%17.30%10.50%-9.80%26.77%-1.29%25.24%-7.59%16.16%

Correlation

The correlation between FHIIX and LAFFX is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 1980

0.24

The correlation between FHIIX and LAFFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.23 (1 year) to 0.45 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHIIX vs. LAFFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHIIX
FHIIX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FHIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
FHIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

LAFFX
LAFFX Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
LAFFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LAFFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
LAFFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
LAFFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
LAFFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHIIX vs. LAFFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes High Income Bond Fund (FHIIX) and Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHIIXLAFFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.42

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.17

3.26

-1.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.79

13.66

-2.87

FHIIX vs. LAFFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the LAFFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHIIX and LAFFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHIIX vs. LAFFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHIIX drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, smaller than the maximum LAFFX drawdown of -60.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHIIX and LAFFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHIIXLAFFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.49%

-60.50%

+25.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

-7.59%

+5.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.56%

-15.38%

+11.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.39%

-19.50%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.19%

-39.59%

+18.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.15%

-0.40%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-9.01%

+3.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

1.81%

-1.31%

Volatility

FHIIX vs. LAFFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes High Income Bond Fund (FHIIX) is 0.74%, while Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund (LAFFX) has a volatility of 3.18%. This indicates that FHIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LAFFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHIIXLAFFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.74%

3.18%

-2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.42%

8.64%

-6.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.14%

10.76%

-7.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.99%

14.62%

-9.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.47%

17.46%

-11.99%

FHIIX vs. LAFFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHIIX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than LAFFX's 0.71% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHIIX vs. LAFFX - Dividend Comparison

FHIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.47%, less than LAFFX's 6.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHIIX
Federated Hermes High Income Bond Fund
5.47%5.29%5.36%5.50%5.70%4.60%4.97%5.28%5.75%5.29%5.14%5.94%
LAFFX
Lord Abbett Affiliated Fund
6.46%7.49%6.32%1.69%7.86%3.86%1.93%4.31%11.75%11.96%7.76%10.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHIIX and LAFFX have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

LAFFX has higher volatility (3.18%) compared to FHIIX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHIIX dropped -35.49% vs LAFFX's -60.50%.

LAFFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.30 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHIIX and LAFFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer