PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHIIX vs. PNGAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHIIX vs. PNGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes High Income Bond Fund (FHIIX) and Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHIIX achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly lower than PNGAX's 9.44% return. Over the past 10 years, FHIIX has underperformed PNGAX with an annualized return of 4.86%, while PNGAX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.60% annualized return.


FHIIX

1D
-0.15%
1M
0.61%
YTD
1.02%
6M
1.31%
1Y
4.96%
3Y*
7.80%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*
4.86%

PNGAX

1D
0.11%
1M
0.32%
YTD
9.44%
6M
9.00%
1Y
23.91%
3Y*
18.86%
5Y*
11.66%
10Y*
10.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHIIX vs. PNGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHIIX
Federated Hermes High Income Bond Fund
1.02%8.00%6.16%12.42%-11.74%4.68%5.90%14.35%-3.06%6.54%
PNGAX
Putnam International Value Fund
9.44%34.66%5.86%18.50%-6.85%14.24%4.19%19.96%-18.02%24.09%

Correlation

The correlation between FHIIX and PNGAX is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 1996

0.37

The correlation between FHIIX and PNGAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.25 (1 year) to 0.47 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHIIX vs. PNGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHIIX
FHIIX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FHIIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHIIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHIIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
FHIIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHIIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

PNGAX
PNGAX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
PNGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PNGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
PNGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
PNGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PNGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHIIX vs. PNGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes High Income Bond Fund (FHIIX) and Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHIIXPNGAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.31

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.05

2.34

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.17

8.60

+1.56

FHIIX vs. PNGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHIIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is comparable to the PNGAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHIIX and PNGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHIIX vs. PNGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHIIX drawdown since its inception was -35.49%, smaller than the maximum PNGAX drawdown of -64.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHIIX and PNGAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHIIXPNGAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.49%

-64.78%

+29.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.51%

-10.51%

+8.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.56%

-13.87%

+10.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.39%

-27.37%

+11.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.19%

-41.58%

+20.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.29%

-0.74%

+0.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.32%

-15.79%

+10.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

2.85%

-2.35%

Volatility

FHIIX vs. PNGAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes High Income Bond Fund (FHIIX) is 0.73%, while Putnam International Value Fund (PNGAX) has a volatility of 3.84%. This indicates that FHIIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PNGAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHIIXPNGAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

3.84%

-3.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.43%

11.76%

-9.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.14%

14.48%

-11.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.99%

15.78%

-10.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.47%

17.00%

-11.53%

FHIIX vs. PNGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHIIX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than PNGAX's 1.27% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHIIX vs. PNGAX - Dividend Comparison

FHIIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.48%, more than PNGAX's 2.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHIIX
Federated Hermes High Income Bond Fund
5.48%5.29%5.36%5.50%5.70%4.60%4.97%5.28%5.75%5.29%5.14%5.94%
PNGAX
Putnam International Value Fund
2.71%2.97%3.89%2.35%1.63%5.70%1.84%3.91%4.34%1.11%2.23%1.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHIIX and PNGAX have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PNGAX has higher volatility (3.84%) compared to FHIIX (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHIIX dropped -35.49% vs PNGAX's -64.78%.

PNGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.70 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHIIX and PNGAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer