FHHFX vs. JRLVX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FHHFX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2040 Fund Class Z) and JRLVX (John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, FHHFX returned 10.27%/yr vs 9.73%/yr for JRLVX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FHHFX charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.01%/yr for JRLVX.

Performance

FHHFX vs. JRLVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2040 Fund Class Z (FHHFX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHHFX achieves a 12.80% return, which is significantly higher than JRLVX's 11.90% return.

FHHFX

• 1D: 1.31%
• 1M: 2.92%
• YTD: 12.80%
• 6M: 12.79%
• 1Y: 28.31%
• 3Y*: 18.97%
• 5Y*: 10.27%
• 10Y*: —

JRLVX

• 1D: 1.10%
• 1M: 1.83%
• YTD: 11.90%
• 6M: 11.63%
• 1Y: 27.09%
• 3Y*: 17.60%
• 5Y*: 9.73%
• 10Y*: 11.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHHFX vs. JRLVX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FHHFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2040 Fund Class Z	12.80%	21.23%	15.70%	20.09%	-18.97%	16.30%	17.94%	26.65%	-11.82%
JRLVX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio	11.90%	19.25%	14.50%	18.00%	-18.06%	18.45%	16.23%	25.03%	-12.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FHHFX and JRLVX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018	0.98

The correlation between FHHFX and JRLVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHHFX vs. JRLVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHHFX

FHHFX Risk / Return Rank: 75
FHHFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FHHFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
FHHFX Omega Ratio Rank: 72
FHHFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
FHHFX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

JRLVX

JRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 70
JRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
JRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
JRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
JRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
JRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHHFX vs. JRLVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2040 Fund Class Z (FHHFX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FHHFX	JRLVX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.31	2.24	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	3.07	+0.12
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.41	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.25	3.15	+0.10
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.97	13.66	+0.31

FHHFX vs. JRLVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHHFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.31, which is comparable to the JRLVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHHFX and JRLVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FHHFX vs. JRLVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHHFX drawdown since its inception was -31.38%, roughly equal to the maximum JRLVX drawdown of -32.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHHFX and JRLVX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHHFX	JRLVX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.38%	-32.53%	+1.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.63%	-8.50%	-0.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.18%	-15.27%	+1.09%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.64%	-25.64%	-2.00%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-32.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.38%	+0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.84%	-4.55%	-1.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.00%	1.96%	+0.04%

Volatility

FHHFX vs. JRLVX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2040 Fund Class Z (FHHFX) has a higher volatility of 5.11% compared to John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio (JRLVX) at 4.82%. This indicates that FHHFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JRLVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHHFX	JRLVX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.11%	4.82%	+0.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.26%	9.88%	+0.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.16%	11.96%	+0.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.60%	14.88%	-0.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.55%	16.03%	+0.52%

FHHFX vs. JRLVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHHFX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than JRLVX's 0.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHHFX vs. JRLVX - Dividend Comparison

FHHFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.75%, more than JRLVX's 3.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHHFX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2040 Fund Class Z	3.75%	2.83%	5.00%	1.90%	6.22%	8.65%	4.89%	3.31%	3.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JRLVX John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2045 Lifetime Portfolio	3.18%	3.55%	1.89%	2.24%	8.03%	6.00%	4.26%	8.99%	10.96%	4.29%	3.40%	1.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHHFX and JRLVX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, FHHFX and JRLVX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FHHFX or JRLVX?

FHHFX has higher volatility (5.11%) compared to JRLVX (4.82%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHHFX dropped -31.38% vs JRLVX's -32.53%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHHFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.