PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHHDX vs. PLTZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHHDX vs. PLTZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Blend 2040 Fund Class K6 (FHHDX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHHDX achieves a 12.85% return, which is significantly higher than PLTZX's 8.98% return.


FHHDX

1D
1.31%
1M
2.91%
YTD
12.85%
6M
12.92%
1Y
28.39%
3Y*
19.12%
5Y*
10.39%
10Y*

PLTZX

1D
1.18%
1M
1.74%
YTD
8.98%
6M
8.85%
1Y
22.20%
3Y*
17.36%
5Y*
9.41%
10Y*
11.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHHDX vs. PLTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHHDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2040 Fund Class K6
12.85%21.35%15.88%20.20%-18.87%16.48%18.08%26.67%-11.33%
PLTZX
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund
8.98%17.76%16.89%20.36%-18.81%18.12%16.60%27.54%-13.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FHHDX and PLTZX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.96

The correlation between FHHDX and PLTZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHHDX vs. PLTZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHHDX
FHHDX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
FHHDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHHDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHHDX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FHHDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHHDX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTZX
PLTZX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
PLTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHHDX vs. PLTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Blend 2040 Fund Class K6 (FHHDX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHHDXPLTZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.32

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

2.52

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.13

11.06

+3.06

FHHDX vs. PLTZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHHDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is higher than the PLTZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHHDX and PLTZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHHDX vs. PLTZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHHDX drawdown since its inception was -31.38%, smaller than the maximum PLTZX drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHHDX and PLTZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHHDXPLTZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.38%

-34.01%

+2.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.60%

-8.70%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.20%

-15.73%

+1.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.54%

-26.79%

-0.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.01%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.63%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.80%

-4.61%

-1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.98%

+0.01%

Volatility

FHHDX vs. PLTZX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Blend 2040 Fund Class K6 (FHHDX) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) at 4.90%. This indicates that FHHDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PLTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHHDXPLTZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.15%

4.90%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.29%

10.34%

-0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.19%

12.49%

-0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.60%

15.57%

-0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.56%

16.04%

+0.52%

FHHDX vs. PLTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHHDX has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTZX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHHDX vs. PLTZX - Dividend Comparison

FHHDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than PLTZX's 7.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHHDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2040 Fund Class K6
3.82%2.91%5.20%1.95%6.27%8.46%5.00%3.43%3.28%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PLTZX
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund
7.65%8.33%7.85%4.12%8.44%5.29%3.60%5.86%5.75%2.73%3.48%3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FHHDX and PLTZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHHDX has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to PLTZX (4.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHHDX dropped -31.38% vs PLTZX's -34.01%.

FHHDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHHDX and PLTZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer