PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHGLX vs. FOTKX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHGLX vs. FOTKX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class Z6 (FHGLX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHGLX achieves a 9.37% return, which is significantly higher than FOTKX's 5.43% return.


FHGLX

1D
0.47%
1M
3.57%
YTD
9.37%
6M
10.46%
1Y
22.10%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
8.35%
10Y*

FOTKX

1D
0.26%
1M
1.88%
YTD
5.43%
6M
5.81%
1Y
12.95%
3Y*
9.32%
5Y*
3.89%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHGLX vs. FOTKX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class Z6
9.37%19.05%14.37%16.96%-17.32%14.17%16.83%25.99%-7.55%7.68%
FOTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6
5.43%11.66%5.55%9.97%-13.05%5.68%11.29%14.46%-3.65%5.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FHGLX and FOTKX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017

0.91

The correlation between FHGLX and FOTKX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHGLX vs. FOTKX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHGLX
FHGLX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FHGLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHGLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHGLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
FHGLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHGLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

FOTKX
FOTKX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FOTKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FOTKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FOTKX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FOTKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FOTKX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHGLX vs. FOTKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class Z6 (FHGLX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHGLXFOTKXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.62

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.55

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

3.26

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.84

14.38

-1.54

FHGLX vs. FOTKX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHGLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.33, which is comparable to the FOTKX Sharpe Ratio of 2.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHGLX and FOTKX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHGLXFOTKXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.33

2.67

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.61

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.74

0.87

-0.13

Drawdowns

FHGLX vs. FOTKX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHGLX drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, which is greater than FOTKX's maximum drawdown of -18.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHGLX and FOTKX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHGLXFOTKXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.20%

-18.29%

-10.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.55%

-4.03%

-3.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.33%

-5.71%

-5.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.75%

-18.29%

-7.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.21%

-3.56%

-1.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

0.91%

+0.83%

Volatility

FHGLX vs. FOTKX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class Z6 (FHGLX) has a higher volatility of 3.37% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6 (FOTKX) at 1.94%. This indicates that FHGLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FOTKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHGLXFOTKXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.37%

1.94%

+1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.00%

4.14%

+3.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.65%

4.92%

+4.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.45%

6.38%

+6.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.06%

6.42%

+7.64%

FHGLX vs. FOTKX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHGLX has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than FOTKX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHGLX vs. FOTKX - Dividend Comparison

FHGLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.70%, more than FOTKX's 4.91% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHGLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2035 Fund Class Z6
7.70%7.75%6.74%1.89%10.32%9.73%6.38%7.66%12.29%2.55%
FOTKX
Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund Class K6
4.91%5.25%3.32%2.98%7.41%9.53%6.17%6.00%7.24%3.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FHGLX and FOTKX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FHGLX has higher volatility (3.37%) compared to FOTKX (1.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHGLX dropped -29.20% vs FOTKX's -18.29%.

FOTKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHGLX and FOTKX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer