PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHEQ vs. XTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHEQ vs. XTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF (FHEQ) and Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FHEQ having a 6.23% return and XTR slightly higher at 6.30%.


FHEQ

1D
-1.15%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
6.23%
6M
5.31%
1Y
17.16%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XTR

1D
-1.06%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
6.30%
6M
5.43%
1Y
19.25%
3Y*
17.03%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHEQ vs. XTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FHEQ
Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF
6.23%13.34%11.10%
XTR
Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF
6.30%13.66%12.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FHEQ and XTR is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2024

0.96

The correlation between FHEQ and XTR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHEQ vs. XTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHEQ
FHEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
FHEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
FHEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

XTR
XTR Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
XTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
XTR Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
XTR Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHEQ vs. XTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF (FHEQ) and Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHEQXTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.05

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.30

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.22

2.27

-0.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.65

9.38

-0.72

FHEQ vs. XTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the XTR Sharpe Ratio of 1.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHEQ and XTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHEQ vs. XTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHEQ drawdown since its inception was -11.12%, smaller than the maximum XTR drawdown of -20.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHEQ and XTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHEQXTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.12%

-20.83%

+9.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.77%

-8.51%

+0.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.84%

-2.81%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.83%

-5.90%

+4.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

2.06%

-0.07%

Volatility

FHEQ vs. XTR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF (FHEQ) is 4.02%, while Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF (XTR) has a volatility of 4.66%. This indicates that FHEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XTR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHEQXTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.02%

4.66%

-0.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.46%

9.03%

-1.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.98%

11.40%

-1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.57%

13.85%

-3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.57%

13.85%

-3.28%

FHEQ vs. XTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHEQ has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than XTR's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHEQ vs. XTR - Dividend Comparison

FHEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%, less than XTR's 16.77% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FHEQ
Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF
0.55%0.63%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XTR
Global X S&P 500 Tail Risk ETF
16.77%17.82%20.89%1.09%1.08%2.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, FHEQ and XTR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XTR has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to FHEQ (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHEQ dropped -11.12% vs XTR's -20.83%.

On 1-year performance, XTR leads with 19.25% vs 17.16% for FHEQ. On fees, XTR is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FHEQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, XTR has performed better with a 19.25% return vs 17.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XTR is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for FHEQ.

XTR has the higher dividend yield at 16.77%, compared with 0.55% for FHEQ.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for FHEQ and 0.25% for XTR.

FHEQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHEQ and XTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer