PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHEQ vs. QQHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHEQ vs. QQHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF (FHEQ) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHEQ achieves a 5.39% return, which is significantly lower than QQHG's 9.22% return.


FHEQ

1D
-0.52%
1M
-2.43%
YTD
5.39%
6M
4.11%
1Y
15.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQHG

1D
0.38%
1M
-0.78%
YTD
9.22%
6M
8.14%
1Y
22.67%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHEQ vs. QQHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FHEQ
Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF
5.39%17.26%
QQHG
Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF
9.22%20.59%

Correlation

The correlation between FHEQ and QQHG is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2025

0.88

The correlation between FHEQ and QQHG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHEQ vs. QQHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHEQ
FHEQ Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
FHEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FHEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

QQHG
QQHG Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
QQHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQHG Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
QQHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQHG Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHEQ vs. QQHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF (FHEQ) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHEQQQHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.41

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

3.68

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.54

13.78

-6.25

FHEQ vs. QQHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.53, which is lower than the QQHG Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHEQ and QQHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHEQ vs. QQHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHEQ drawdown since its inception was -11.12%, which is greater than QQHG's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHEQ and QQHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHEQQQHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.12%

-6.18%

-4.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.77%

-6.18%

-1.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.61%

-2.23%

-1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.83%

-1.03%

-0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

1.65%

+0.36%

Volatility

FHEQ vs. QQHG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF (FHEQ) is 3.99%, while Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG) has a volatility of 4.36%. This indicates that FHEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHEQQQHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

4.36%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.46%

7.61%

-0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.95%

10.12%

-0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.56%

10.08%

+0.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.56%

10.08%

+0.48%

FHEQ vs. QQHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHEQ has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is higher than QQHG's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHEQ vs. QQHG - Dividend Comparison

FHEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, more than QQHG's 0.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
FHEQ
Fidelity Hedged Equity ETF
0.56%0.63%0.50%
QQHG
Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF
0.26%0.17%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHEQ and QQHG have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QQHG has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to FHEQ (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHEQ dropped -11.12% vs QQHG's -6.18%.

On 1-year performance, QQHG leads with 22.67% vs 15.13% for FHEQ. On fees, QQHG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FHEQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, QQHG has performed better with a 22.67% return vs 15.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQHG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.48% for FHEQ.

FHEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.26% for QQHG.

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for FHEQ and 0.45% for QQHG.

QQHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHEQ and QQHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer