PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHCOX vs. TSDUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHCOX vs. TSDUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund (FHCOX) and Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Ultra-ShortTerm Fixed Income Fund (TSDUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FHCOX having a 1.54% return and TSDUX slightly higher at 1.56%.


FHCOX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.54%
6M
1.91%
1Y
4.48%
3Y*
4.98%
5Y*
3.47%
10Y*

TSDUX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.56%
6M
1.98%
1Y
3.17%
3Y*
4.90%
5Y*
3.35%
10Y*
2.66%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHCOX vs. TSDUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FHCOX
Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund
1.54%4.94%5.34%4.80%0.76%0.14%
TSDUX
Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Ultra-ShortTerm Fixed Income Fund
1.56%3.24%6.04%5.94%0.41%-0.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FHCOX and TSDUX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.15

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2021

0.12

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHCOX vs. TSDUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHCOX
FHCOX Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
FHCOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHCOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHCOX Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
FHCOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHCOX Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

TSDUX
TSDUX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
TSDUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSDUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSDUX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TSDUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSDUX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHCOX vs. TSDUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund (FHCOX) and Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Ultra-ShortTerm Fixed Income Fund (TSDUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHCOXTSDUXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.37

3.71

-0.34

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

12.72

5.15

+7.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

4.67

3.14

+1.53

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

14.99

8.83

+6.16

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

78.37

28.77

+49.60

FHCOX vs. TSDUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHCOX Sharpe Ratio is 3.37, which is comparable to the TSDUX Sharpe Ratio of 3.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHCOX and TSDUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHCOXTSDUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.37

3.71

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.41

3.13

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

2.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.36

2.48

-0.12

Drawdowns

FHCOX vs. TSDUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHCOX drawdown since its inception was -0.59%, smaller than the maximum TSDUX drawdown of -3.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHCOX and TSDUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHCOXTSDUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.59%

-3.94%

+3.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.30%

-0.41%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.50%

-0.73%

+0.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.59%

-1.72%

+1.13%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.10%

-0.19%

+0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.06%

0.14%

-0.08%

Volatility

FHCOX vs. TSDUX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund (FHCOX) has a higher volatility of 0.40% compared to Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Ultra-ShortTerm Fixed Income Fund (TSDUX) at 0.17%. This indicates that FHCOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TSDUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHCOXTSDUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.40%

0.17%

+0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.92%

0.62%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33%

1.03%

+0.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.44%

1.11%

+0.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.40%

1.09%

+0.31%

FHCOX vs. TSDUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHCOX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than TSDUX's 0.62% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHCOX vs. TSDUX - Dividend Comparison

FHCOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, more than TSDUX's 2.91% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FHCOX
Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund
4.38%4.61%4.99%4.17%1.26%0.24%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSDUX
Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Ultra-ShortTerm Fixed Income Fund
2.91%3.09%5.03%1.55%6.36%0.60%1.65%2.84%2.66%2.22%1.87%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHCOX and TSDUX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHCOX has higher volatility (0.40%) compared to TSDUX (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHCOX dropped -0.59% vs TSDUX's -3.94%.

TSDUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.71 vs 3.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHCOX and TSDUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer