FHCOX vs. FAPGX
FHCOX (Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund) and FAPGX (Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 3 years, FHCOX returned 4.98%/yr vs 4.91%/yr for FAPGX. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FHCOX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FAPGX.
Performance
FHCOX vs. FAPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHCOX achieves a 1.54% return, which is significantly higher than FAPGX's 1.39% return.
FHCOX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.54%
- 6M
- 1.91%
- 1Y
- 4.48%
- 3Y*
- 4.98%
- 5Y*
- 3.47%
- 10Y*
- —
FAPGX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 4.11%
- 3Y*
- 4.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FHCOX vs. FAPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHCOX Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund | 1.54% | 4.94% | 5.34% | 4.80% | 0.97% |
FAPGX Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond | 1.39% | 4.57% | 5.32% | 5.28% | 0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between FHCOX and FAPGX is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2022 | 0.34 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FHCOX vs. FAPGX — Risk / Return Rank
FHCOX
FAPGX
FHCOX vs. FAPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund (FHCOX) and Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond (FAPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHCOX | FAPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 4.67 | 3.24 | +1.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.99 | 14.05 | +0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 78.37 | 64.52 | +13.85 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHCOX | FAPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.37 | 3.69 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 2.41 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.36 | 3.88 | -1.52 |
Drawdowns
FHCOX vs. FAPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHCOX drawdown since its inception was -0.59%, which is greater than FAPGX's maximum drawdown of -0.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHCOX and FAPGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHCOX | FAPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.59% | -0.49% | -0.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.30% | -0.29% | -0.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.50% | -0.39% | -0.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.59% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -0.06% | -0.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | 0.06% | 0.00% |
Volatility
FHCOX vs. FAPGX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund (FHCOX) has a higher volatility of 0.40% compared to Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond (FAPGX) at 0.26%. This indicates that FHCOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FHCOX | FAPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.40% | 0.26% | +0.14% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.91% | 0.83% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33% | 1.12% | +0.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.44% | 1.07% | +0.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.40% | 1.07% | +0.33% |
FHCOX vs. FAPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHCOX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than FAPGX's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FHCOX vs. FAPGX - Dividend Comparison
FHCOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.38%, less than FAPGX's 4.63% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAPGX Fidelity Sustainable Low Duration Bond | 4.63% | 4.40% | 4.81% | 3.44% | 0.77% | 0.00% |
FHCOX Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund | 4.38% | 4.61% | 4.99% | 4.17% | 1.26% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FHCOX and FAPGX have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FHCOX has higher volatility (0.40%) compared to FAPGX (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHCOX dropped -0.59% vs FAPGX's -0.49%.
FAPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.69 vs 3.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FHCOX and FAPGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer