FHCOX vs. BUBIX
FHCOX (Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund) and BUBIX (Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund Institutional Class) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, FHCOX returned 3.44%/yr vs 3.62%/yr for BUBIX. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FHCOX charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for BUBIX.
Performance
FHCOX vs. BUBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FHCOX having a 1.43% return and BUBIX slightly lower at 1.37%.
FHCOX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 1.80%
- 1Y
- 4.38%
- 3Y*
- 4.94%
- 5Y*
- 3.44%
- 10Y*
- —
BUBIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 1.37%
- 6M
- 1.43%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 4.92%
- 5Y*
- 3.62%
- 10Y*
- 2.68%
FHCOX vs. BUBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHCOX Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund | 1.43% | 4.94% | 5.34% | 4.80% | 0.76% | 0.14% |
BUBIX Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund Institutional Class | 1.37% | 4.44% | 5.65% | 5.71% | 0.96% | 0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between FHCOX and BUBIX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2021 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FHCOX vs. BUBIX — Risk / Return Rank
FHCOX
BUBIX
FHCOX vs. BUBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund (FHCOX) and Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund Institutional Class (BUBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FHCOX | BUBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 3.87 | 5.89 | -2.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 14.70 | 13.32 | +1.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 74.06 | 94.42 | -20.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FHCOX vs. BUBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHCOX drawdown since its inception was -0.59%, smaller than the maximum BUBIX drawdown of -1.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHCOX and BUBIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHCOX | BUBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.59% | -1.88% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.30% | -0.30% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -0.50% | -0.30% | -0.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -0.59% | -0.68% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -1.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | 0.00% | -0.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.10% | -0.05% | -0.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.06% | 0.04% | +0.02% |
Volatility
FHCOX vs. BUBIX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund (FHCOX) has a higher volatility of 0.44% compared to Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund Institutional Class (BUBIX) at 0.26%. This indicates that FHCOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FHCOX | BUBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.44% | 0.26% | +0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 0.93% | 0.55% | +0.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36% | 0.72% | +0.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 1.44% | 0.80% | +0.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1.40% | 0.71% | +0.69% |
FHCOX vs. BUBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHCOX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than BUBIX's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
FHCOX vs. BUBIX - Dividend Comparison
FHCOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than BUBIX's 3.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUBIX Baird Ultra Short Bond Fund Institutional Class | 3.95% | 4.16% | 5.31% | 4.65% | 1.56% | 0.50% | 1.44% | 2.57% | 2.13% | 1.29% | 1.04% | 0.80% |
FHCOX Federated Hermes Conservative Microshort Fund | 4.39% | 4.61% | 4.99% | 4.17% | 1.26% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FHCOX and BUBIX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FHCOX has higher volatility (0.44%) compared to BUBIX (0.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHCOX dropped -0.59% vs BUBIX's -1.88%.
BUBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.48 vs 3.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FHCOX and BUBIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer