PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHCCX vs. GGHCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHCCX vs. GGHCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) and Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHCCX achieves a 8.12% return, which is significantly higher than GGHCX's 1.86% return. Over the past 10 years, FHCCX has underperformed GGHCX with an annualized return of 6.38%, while GGHCX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.89% annualized return.


FHCCX

1D
-1.75%
1M
-3.04%
6M
7.24%
YTD
8.12%
1Y
7.68%
3Y*
2.07%
5Y*
-1.00%
10Y*
6.38%
ALL TIME*
9.24%

GGHCX

1D
-1.60%
1M
-4.20%
6M
2.25%
YTD
1.86%
1Y
16.64%
3Y*
7.68%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*
6.89%
ALL TIME*
9.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FHCCX vs. GGHCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHCCX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C
8.12%-5.49%3.20%3.02%-13.72%10.43%20.15%26.96%6.37%23.12%
GGHCX
Invesco Health Care Fund
1.86%15.48%3.96%3.05%-13.53%12.05%14.52%32.01%0.27%15.51%

Correlation

The correlation between FHCCX and GGHCX is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.91

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 1996

0.87

The correlation between FHCCX and GGHCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHCCX vs. GGHCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FHCCX
FHCCX Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
FHCCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHCCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHCCX Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FHCCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHCCX Martin Ratio Rank: 66
Martin Ratio Rank

GGHCX
GGHCX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GGHCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGHCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGHCX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
GGHCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGHCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FHCCX vs. GGHCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) and Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHCCXGGHCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.21

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.27

1.28

-1.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.47

2.79

-2.32

FHCCX vs. GGHCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHCCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.30, which is lower than the GGHCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHCCX and GGHCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHCCX vs. GGHCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHCCX drawdown since its inception was -45.28%, which is greater than GGHCX's maximum drawdown of -40.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHCCX and GGHCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHCCXGGHCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-45.28%

-40.23%

-5.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.25%

-13.53%

-13.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.25%

-16.86%

-10.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.67%

-25.37%

-4.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.67%

-29.34%

-0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.81%

-4.48%

-8.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.22%

-8.80%

-1.42%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.52%

6.16%

+9.36%

Volatility

FHCCX vs. GGHCX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C (FHCCX) and Invesco Health Care Fund (GGHCX) have volatilities of 5.40% and 5.37%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHCCXGGHCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.40%

5.37%

+0.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.57%

11.55%

+2.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.51%

14.36%

+10.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.79%

15.72%

+4.07%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.62%

17.45%

+2.17%

FHCCX vs. GGHCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHCCX has a 1.72% expense ratio, which is higher than GGHCX's 1.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHCCX vs. GGHCX - Dividend Comparison

FHCCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GGHCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.58%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHCCX
Fidelity Advisor Health Care Fund Class C
0.00%0.00%17.59%0.00%0.00%8.32%6.85%0.41%6.43%0.00%0.00%7.84%
GGHCX
Invesco Health Care Fund
5.58%5.69%5.17%0.00%0.00%24.69%6.44%3.51%8.81%6.88%2.24%15.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHCCX and GGHCX have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHCCX has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to GGHCX (5.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHCCX dropped -45.28% vs GGHCX's -40.23%.

GGHCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHCCX and GGHCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer